Re: [doc] podling software releases

On Feb 11, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Firstly, thank you for clarifying the process. With the last milestone release of the Woden podling we struggled. Just a quick question ... you seem to imply that every podling has a PPMC. In Woden we do not as we don't envisage ever becoming a T

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Sorry ... the question is ... are we doing this right? Or should every podling actually have a PPMC. Thanks, Jeremy On 2/11/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Firstly, thank you for clarifying the process. With the last milestone > release of the Woden podling we struggled. Just a qui

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Firstly, thank you for clarifying the process. With the last milestone release of the Woden podling we struggled. Just a quick question ... you seem to imply that every podling has a PPMC. In Woden we do not as we don't envisage ever becoming a TLP. So our binding votes are the committers' votes.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit version 0.9-incubating

On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Roy, Two things: - I know that YOU checked the distribution, but the URL for the packages being requested should still be provided. :-) Oh, crap, sorry -- I did mean to do that as well. I found http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackr

Re: Status page committed

On 2/11/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This might be my fault -- I told Allen that only ASF members had > the required permissions to generate the site. If other committers > can do it too I can take care of generating it while Allen is on > vacation this week. Any one who can commi

Re: Status page committed

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 2/9/06, Allen Brookes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The xmlbeanscxx status page has been committed. I'm told that http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html needs to be updated with a link to our status page. Can