Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Sander Striker
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:02 PM > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > >> I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN. [...] > Agreed. -1 as a requirement; +1 as a recommendation. Ditto. Sander --

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 13, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN. +1 Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN. +1 > Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a > requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. - -1 as a requirement, +1 as a strong recomme

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 03:40, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN. > > Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a > requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would > certainly make it easier to keep track of pe

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread David Crossley
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a > > requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would > > certainly make it easier to keep track of permissions across all > > Incubator-dependant repositories

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Daniel Quinlan wrote: Oh, SpamAssassin is not in the incubator any more, but boy, SVN is MUCH MUCH better than CVS. I highly recommend it. I definitely wasn't referring to the SVN *server*, which I would surely enjoy. I am talking about tools and integration. Jochen -- http://lilypie.com/baby1/0

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is quite reasonable, that this will change over the next year. But, > as the situation is now, I would consider it a pain to use SVN in > everydays work. That is also the reason, where I do not support > switching to SVN in the Apache projects, I

Re: [Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would certainly make it easier to keep track of permissions across all Incubator-dependant repositories. I still do believe, that SVN isn't suffici

[Proposal] Remove the '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mailing list

2004-09-13 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
For "small" projects we have created a common [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Over time I haven't seen that a common list is needed, as all common requests go to the general mailing list. In essence, it's not working as the Jakarta commons mailing list, as because most projects have their own

[Proposal] Switch to SVN

2004-09-13 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN. Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would certainly make it easier to keep track of permissions across all Incubator-dependant repositories. -- Nicola