>>I have no problem with the idea of supporting mod_cli, to coin a vendor
>>independent name, but please review:
>> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/03/11/mono.html
>>in depth, specifically the "Two Stacks" section. My concern is related to
>>the impact of Microsoft IP on whatver portion(s
At 05:03 PM 3/15/2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>The phrase "Support the Microsoft ASP.NET System.Web.Hosting interface"
>raises concern with me, due to Microsoft's .NET patents and copyrights.
Here is something fascinating...
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG
At 07:00 PM 3/15/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>At 05:03 PM 3/15/2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>The phrase "Support the Microsoft ASP.NET System.Web.Hosting interface"
>>raises concern with me, due to Microsoft's .NET patents and copyrights.
>
>Note that I say specifically *support*. Don't
At 05:03 PM 3/15/2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>All in all, I think it is a fine idea. One thing caught my attention, and
>that was the comment:
>
>> The initial code contribution would consist of:
>>
>> Support the Microsoft ASP.NET System.Web.Hosting interface from
>> within the Apache httpd
All in all, I think it is a fine idea. One thing caught my attention, and
that was the comment:
> The initial code contribution would consist of:
>
> Support the Microsoft ASP.NET System.Web.Hosting interface from
> within the Apache httpd server (Windows platform port).
>
> Later code could
Incubator folks,
this submission was voted in with all +1's from the httpd pmc, for incubation.
I see the final list as [EMAIL PROTECTED] - can that list be used for the initial
vetting as well?
From this point in the incubator I'm not sure of the process flow - help is
greatly appreciated.
Bil
Sorry, when I type 'general@' I get completion to incubator, and if I forget
to go all the way to adding the @g I can mis-send. My apologies, I really
need to add an alias.
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday,
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/project_fixes.html#Project+Summary
Daft as it seems, this is a bit of a milestone -- we've hit 70% success.
[70.50%] Not that we aren't shooting to get up to 100%, so have a ways to
go, but at least we've been consistently moving in the right general
direction t
