Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:58, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > Adam Jack contacted me personally just > > to shoot the shit about Ruper and I told him his code would be welcome > > in Maven. > > I was hoping that Apache was somehow Utopian and folks could co-operate, > bury ego, and work for the greater

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 21:47, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:33, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until > > it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can > > decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:33, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until > it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can > decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a board vote) or > part of an existing project (calling fo

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> I don't care if there is some overlap with Wagon, nor do I care for > any further discussion about which one is better -- if I can't find > some objective criteria for evaluating software, then I obviously > don't need that software. Once I need it, I can figure out for myself > which one is bet

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Adam Jack contacted me personally just > to shoot the shit about Ruper and I told him his code would be welcome > in Maven. I was hoping that Apache was somehow Utopian and folks could co-operate, bury ego, and work for the greater good of softwaredom, yada yada. When you invited the Ruper code

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Roy T. Fielding
There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a board vote) or part of an existing project (calling for that project's pmc to vote). Maybe we should have a six mo

RE: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 13:06, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Jason, > > The short answer is that knowledge of the final destination is not a > pre-requisite for entrance into the Incubator. The minimum requirement for > entrance is sponsorship by a Member or Officer, and acceptance by the > Incubator PM

RE: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

2003-12-07 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Jason, The short answer is that knowledge of the final destination is not a pre-requisite for entrance into the Incubator. The minimum requirement for entrance is sponsorship by a Member or Officer, and acceptance by the Incubator PMC. I've no particular care about where AltRMI or FtpServer end