[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 26 23:45:25 EST 2003

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/11/11 00:01:00 $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://Nagoya.Apache.Org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheIncubatorProjectPages [note: the Web site is the 'official' documenta

RE: FYI Nice JSR77 and JSR88 Tools

Please disregard this was intended for the Geronimo list. Sorry, Alex > -Original Message- > From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FYI Nice JSR77 and JSR88 Tools > > Hey guys, > > > > Came across

RE: Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 04:30, Alex Karasulu wrote: > We've already made announcements. If this is the way you want > us to proceed I can recall the infrastructure request. Should > we do that? You already did the announcements, and I personally have less of a problem subscribing the list of peop

FYI Nice JSR77 and JSR88 Tools

Hey guys, Came across some cool tools out there that you may be interested in looking at - you guys probably already saw them. Any way here's the link: http://www.ejtools.org Oh and I had a great time meeting and talking to the Geronimo team at the confe

RE: Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

We've already made announcements. If this is the way you want us to proceed I can recall the infrastructure request. Should we do that? Alex > -Original Message- > From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc

Are bug fix releases allowed while in the incubator.

As you guys already know we had a couple of alpha releases of the server while at sf.net. Some users may request bug fixes to existing releases. Does anyone know about how we can handle managing our existing user community? If bugs are found are we allowed to fix the code and release old ver

Re: Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

We're going take Sander's advice here and would like to make sure that all the following users are added to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. We will shutdown the sf.net mail lists once we have confirmation that all users have been added. Why don't you simply ask those people to subscribe to the new lis

RE: Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

Hello, We're going take Sander's advice here and would like to make sure that all the following users are added to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. We will shutdown the sf.net mail lists once we have confirmation that all users have been added. For the record I'm going to shutdown lists and forums

RE: Generated sites

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 12:44, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Had that done the night you were asking on infrastructure > > > that we leave Maven on codehaus because you didn't want to > > > move at the time. > > > Because no one gave me a heads up until after the fact which annoyed me > > greatly. >

Re: Generated sites

Noel J. Bergman wrote: I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a Wiki setup and JIRA. On top of all the work that Jason Dillon did, Leo Simon worked all night tonight on code changes to MoinMoin. It appears he's finished. The Geronino and General Wikis need updating

RE: Wonka

Jason van Zyl wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > (Still curious about project Wonka) > > > > http://wonka.acunia.com > > > > Open Source JVM under what should be an ASL compatible license. > Holy shit! That's awesome! :-) I thought so. I've been following it for a while, since it is embedda

RE: Generated sites

> > Had that done the night you were asking on infrastructure > > that we leave Maven on codehaus because you didn't want to > > move at the time. > Because no one gave me a heads up until after the fact which annoyed me > greatly. After what fact? I didn't realize that you needed to be consulte

RE: Generated sites

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 00:01, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Migration is not built into Jira. The XML export is for backup, not > > > migration. I hacked a migration of the database, but we ran into > > > some problems. Jeff, who works for Atlassian, asked if he could > > > take over the migration

Re: Wonka

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 07:57, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > (Still curious about project Wonka) > > http://wonka.acunia.com > > Open Source JVM under what should be an ASL compatible license. Holy shit! That's awesome! > --- Noel > > ---

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Other votes? +1, generally agreeing with all other comments made so far. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Generated sites

Leo Simons wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> My personal example was once trying to get Scarab running on >> Nagoya and not being able to find Pier for a week. I was all >> ready and raring to go and was stopped dead in my tracks. > > Ah...I get it now...I've had moments like that (for example, want

Re: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

Conor MacNeill wrote: hi Greg, Maybe it would be a good idea to forward this or somethign similar to the committers list. I'd say there is a number of a committers who are not aware of these legal issues. Whaddayareckon? Add members to it too, please. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAI

RE: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

hi Greg, Maybe it would be a good idea to forward this or somethign similar to the committers list. I'd say there is a number of a committers who are not aware of these legal issues. Whaddayareckon? Conor > If you don't have a binding vote, then you are not responsible. The people > *with* th

Wonka

> (Still curious about project Wonka) http://wonka.acunia.com Open Source JVM under what should be an ASL compatible license. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

+1 (Still curious about project Wonka) Cheers, Berin Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Since the "repo" moniker has a bad connotation to some, given that this is meant to be an implamantation of the repository effort, and since Rupert is too common in google, I change the proposed name to Ruper

Re: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:43:33PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: >... > When the James project was initially looking at TLP status, Nicola Ken > forwarded a message from Roy that included a comment to the effect that if > Committers understood their legal exposure, they would demand TLP status, > r

[VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

Since the "repo" moniker has a bad connotation to some, given that this is meant to be an implamantation of the repository effort, and since Rupert is too common in google, I change the proposed name to Ruper (for what it's worth). Others have asked to be able to help, so the committers would p

Re: Generated sites

Jason van Zyl wrote: what exactly do you doubt? That somewhere between getting access and now, in your moment of fire of trying to get something done you were stopped in your tracks because you were probably waiting on something else to happen first. I should have explained that better. My pe

Re: Finalizing the new Project STATUS template

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Finally I have finished the new draft for a project incubation status page that should be more workable. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NewProjectStatusTemplate Minor nit: there actually is a Wonka project, so let's not use the name. :-) :-) Items in tables that need to b

Re: Forwarding sf.net email to Apache Directory

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 01:32, Alex Karasulu wrote: > Guys, > > I there are no objections I would like to forward mail from the sf.net > ldapd project to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is obviously > a short term thing until the community has switched over completely to > the Apache infrastructu