Roy T. Fielding wrote:
...
The ability to make ASF decisions starts with the board and is
delegated to officers and their associated committees. Anyone casting
binding votes (meaning votes that are counted toward making a decision)
must be listed as a member of the committee on which they are voti
Sam Ruby wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
...
Jakarta got into a weird state
wherein committer == voter and commit-access was given out like candy,
thus leading to the notion that committers run ASF projects. I don't
believe it is appropriate to link voting with cvs access.
...
P.S. Can somebody exp
Phil Steitz wrote:
...
Are you proposing that committers who are not PMC members or "Project
Committers" should not have voting rights?
On the PMC list it has come out that we were misunderstanding each other
over the term "binding votes".
Let me explain what we said.
Some talked about a vote m
Roy,
Thankyou. Read with great interest, and it put a few things into
perspective. Particularly the fact that to me the Practice PMCs made no
sense from my perspective (based in the XML project's world). I think I
now understand why.
Couple of things came to mind whilst I was ruminating on
I didn't mean that the gallery would be under LGPL specifically, but
something akin to it. As I understand, there are really three types of
licensing for intellectual property:
1) Owner restricts access to the property, and charges to use it
(Microsoft,
SCO, etc.)
2) Owner allows others to u
