Ted Leung wrote:
> What is the exact licensing of pluto.jar?
It's not a *single* pluto.jar. The JARs pluto
generates are the portlet API JAR and the
reference impl. container JARs.
We are currently working on the licence.
In general we want to provide it royalty-free,
as-is, redistributable, etc.
Steven Noels wrote:
> Out of curiosity: what's the specific problem with pluto.jar? Who is
> still discussing stuff with lawyers (IIUC)?
That's me. The problem is that wsrp4j usese pluto *JARs*
which contain the portlet API classes and the JSR168 reference
impl. container. The code for these is n
