JSR-173 fits very well with the cursor-style strategy on the store.
This is especially true of 173's XmlStreamReader interface - it
can avoid object creation when iterating through XML. We've been
closely reviewing the JSR and providing feedback to the EG.
173 hasn't gone final yet, but we'll be
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 10:25 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
On 6/07/2003 16:56 Aleksander Slominski wrote:
It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and
I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more
mementum and I am willing to help with it (even thou
(this is an attempt to explain rather than start another useless flame war.
..)
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 12:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:22:10PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
The division of XML vs Jakarta predates me for certain, but I think the
main
issues surroundi
If Cliff is able to communicate BEA's preference, and the LGPL Piccolo
issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting
new committers is easier when the project is already under incubation.
Agreed.
-
To un
On 6/07/2003 16:56 Aleksander Slominski wrote:
It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and
I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more
mementum and I am willing to help with it (even though I am not Apache
XML commiter)
This proposal is still la
Thanks to all of you for the many offers to help us get things
started with XMLBeans. It sounds like it might be easier for everyone
if we now pick one project that we believe would be the best fit for
XMLBeans. From talking with a few committers, I think we are leaning
towards the XML project,
