[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Feb 5 23:45:44 EST 2003

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/27 15:23:52 $] Background: o See the bottom of this file for the official resolution/ charter-as-it-stands o IRC channel #apache-incubator on irc.openprojects.net traf

Re: Incubator New Project Proposal: basicPortal.sf.net

- "Hello?" - "Go away, the Wizard of Oz is doing Maven." - "But I need a heart?" Is mostly everyone indifferent to basicPortal? basicPortal would kind of uses open source NullSoft to create setup.exe, and not Maven. (it that an angle to get some comments :)). How about is General or Incubator t

Re: [patch] contributor tech guide for www.apache.org/dev/

Joshua Slive wrote, On 05/02/2003 23.15: Having given a very quick read to this stuff, I have two comments: 1. I hate to pass the buck, but I think the best place for this is the incubator. See: http://incubator.apache.org/drafts/newcommitters.html They are trying to be the place for both proj

Re: Incubator New Project Proposal: basicPortal.sf.net

I am already working on 4 sites with the basicportal framework. www.murphyfutures.com is currently based on Jetspeed but i'm converting to bp and www.eagleinfosystems.com is Turbine based and will be switched to bp. I have 2 other development sites I'm working on that will use the framework also.

OpenSAML proposal (was Re: JSR 155)

Folks, FYI. I had asked Sandeep and Krishna to chime in about the OpenSAML proposal. Thanks, dims --- Sandeep Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Krishna Sankar, the JSR 155 Spec Lead, is on travel, and we will respond > once we get a chance to discuss this a little further

JSR 155

Dear Colleagues, Krishna Sankar, the JSR 155 Spec Lead, is on travel, and we will respond once we get a chance to discuss this a little further. Thanks for your patience! Regards, Sandeep Kumar Spec Co-Lead, JSR 155 - To

Re: AltRMI ??

At 3:50 PM +0100 2/5/03, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >Paul Hammant wrote, On 05/02/2003 14.19: >>Hi folks, >> >>So have we decided to move AltRMI here from Avalon? I only saw votes in favour so >can I assume >>this is green-lighted? > >I was thinking about this right now (wierd). I saw positive vot

Re: AltRMI ??

+1 for AltRMI overall if I haven't said so already. -Andy Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Paul Hammant wrote, On 05/02/2003 14.19: Hi folks, So have we decided to move AltRMI here from Avalon? I only saw votes in favour so can I assume this is green-lighted? I was thinking about this right no

Re: AltRMI ??

Paul Hammant wrote, On 05/02/2003 14.19: Hi folks, So have we decided to move AltRMI here from Avalon? I only saw votes in favour so can I assume this is green-lighted? I was thinking about this right now (wierd). I saw positive votes from Avalon, and AFAIK no negative vote from incubator pe

AltRMI ??

Hi folks, So have we decided to move AltRMI here from Avalon? I only saw votes in favour so can I assume this is green-lighted? - Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email