Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query-05

On 01/09/2016 11:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: (added dnsop to the CC: for some feedback) Thanks for the review Brian! > Summary: Almost ready > > > Comment: > > > As noted in the writeup, there was some WG controversy about this choice > of method, but since the proposed s

Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Michael Sinatra wrote: On 2019-04-06 02:16, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: Page 9, Section 8, 2nd paragraph: append a comma after "Hoffman". "Imminent" in this sentence is probably not the word you want in document at time of publication, although it's fine to prod the n

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07

On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, Alissa Cooper wrote: Peter, thanks for your review. I entered a Yes ballot and pointed to your review. Indeed, thanks for the review Peter! I've incorporated all of your suggestions, with the exception of: Page 4, Section 1.3: In general, it would be nice if there were

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-labeled-ipsec-10

On Mon, 10 Apr 2023, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: The document is well written and easy to read. Thanks :) Nits/editorial comments: Section 3.2: "198.51.0/24" --> "198.51.100.0/24" ? Fixed in -11. Question: Section 2.1, the Security Label should be at least of one octet. Is there

Re: [Gen-art] [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [Ext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, Salz, Rich wrote: [ speaking as individual only ] On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an important term in the current document seems like a better solution. If the WG agrees that this is an important term, sure. Well, if the IETF has co

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote: Using my Author Hat only. Nits/editorial comments: Some of the steps described for "Confidentiality/authentication via Encryption" are not clear to me. Hope the authors can answers the following questions: Section 2.1: Step 3 says that t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14

On Feb 22, 2024, at 17:36, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > > But, if I am asked to do a telechat review of this document I will raise the > issue so that the IESG think about it. Then it will be their call. Note you don’t have to wait to be invited for that. During last-call, voice what you want to v

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-06

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:08 AM Valery Smyslov wrote: I've added the following sentence to the Introduction: > >Since IKEv2 doesn't allow to use multiple >authentication methods and doesn't provide means for peers to >indicate to the other side which authentication methods they support

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-06

I can live with that.PaulSent using a virtual keyboard on a phoneOn Apr 2, 2024, at 03:10, Valery Smyslov wrote:Hi Paul, On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 9:08 AM Valery Smyslov wrote: I've added the following sentence to the Introduction:   Since IKEv2 doesn't allow to use multiple   authen