Elwyn,
Thanks for the review. Please see my comments below:
-- Original Message --
From: "Elwyn Davies"
To: "General Area Review Team"
Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts@tools.ietf.org
Sent: 9/23/2013 9:17:42 AM
Subject: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqt
Elwyn,
Comments below:
>Minor issues:
>s4.3: I am not clear whether there needs to be any special
>consideration
>if the B2BUA doesn't support Session-ID. There could be a number of
>other cases to consider. In particular whether the B2BUA would
forward
>the Session-ID if it didn't und
Elwyn,
Please see my comments below:
-- Original Message --
From: "Elwyn Davies"
To: "Paul E. Jones"
Cc: "General Area Review Team" ;
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts@tools.ietf.org
Sent: 9/25/2013 6:47:50 PM
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review of
E, Keith (Keith)"
To: "Paul E. Jones" ; "Elwyn Davies"
Cc: "General Area Review Team" ;
"draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts@tools.ietf.org"
Sent: 9/26/2013 5:42:10 AM
Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-08.tx
Thanks. I made the correction in my local copy.
-- Original Message --
From: "Elwyn Davies"
To: "General Area Review Team"
Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts@tools.ietf.org
Sent: 1/31/2014 1:13:33 PM
Subject: Gen-art telechat review of
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts-09
Folks,
Alissa asked me to review the current text, provide input, and help
address some of the current DISCUSS points.
Here are some suggested improvements:
Editorial:
In Section 4.1, it says "Subsequent FloorStatus messages consist of
server-initiated transactions, and therefore their Trans
Robert,
I am finally getting an opportunity to make updates to the text.
I have responses below...
-- Original Message --
From: "Robert Sparks"
To: "General Area Review Team" ; "i...@ietf.org"
; draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-...@ietf.org
Sent: 3/31/2016 12:39:13 PM
Subject: GenArt LC revie
Linda,
Thanks for your feedback. Please see comments inline.
Major issues:
The SRTP Master Key described in Section 6.4 is not listed in the Figure 4 Key
Inventory. What is the relationship between the KEK listed in the Figure 4 Key
Inventory and the SRTP Master Key?
The SRTP master key i
David,
> Summary: Well, given that this document is being balloted for publication
> as
> Historic, I'm not sure what criteria I should be using for the review, but
> I'll assume the bar is lower for Historic than for the original Proposed
> Standard.
"Historic" is a regrettable decision, in my o
Brian,
> Major Issues:
> -
>
> There is no explicit discussion of privacy in the draft, which seems to
> me to carry evident privacy risks. For example, imagine an ISP that
> kindly decides to support webfinger for all customers by default,
> and preloads personally identifiable inf
Russ,
Thanks for the review. I have made changes as you (and Shawn)
suggested. Please see this diff which contains a rewritten security
considerations section. Please feel free to comment further since it's
quite possible that I created more confusion.
I also tried to address your questio
11 matches
Mail list logo
