ors to fix it.
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.-- Laboratoře CZ.NIC
Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.czhttps://nic.cz/
s/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml
by its name.
The paragraph with nit has been removed altogether per Magnus's request.
Thank you all very much for the reviews.
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
CZ.NI
> ... Regardless of whether or not the attacks on SHA-1 will
> affect SSHFP, it is believed (at the time of this writing) that SHA-
> 256 is the better choice for use in SSHFP records.
Well, thanks goes to authors of RFC 5702 :)
> [...]
All your other comments not mentioned here
ords.
I believe that now all concerns are solved, but I haven't got the review
from secdir yet.
O.
--
Ondřej Surý
vedoucí výzkumu/Head of R&D department
---
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.--Laboratoře CZ.NIC
Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Repub
