Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09

2020-09-08 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
rget > user > group > geography > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Some of the acronyms are not expanded at first occurrence (VoIP, VoLTE, > DDoS, etc. ) > > > > > > > -- === Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. Associate Professor D

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09

2020-09-08 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
be found? > > context-capability > acl-number > application > target > user > group > geography > > => I put the references for the above condition capabilities. Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Some of the acronyms are not expanded at first occurrence (VoIP,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-09

2020-09-09 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
w > point of view. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:44 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < > jaehoon.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> I have addressed your comments in the revision: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iet

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

2021-11-29 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
model. It seems more to be a higher-level description of the > entire I2NSF system, but the details of the data model aren't directly > relevant to the higher-level description (as long as the data model > provides the required fields) and that the data model isn't directly >

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

2021-11-29 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
t would be of more > > interest than the cookies header in the response. > > > > 6.3.5. VoIP/VoLTE Event > > > > This event type has no event-type field. Is that correct? > > > > 6.4.3. User Activity Log > > > > 6.4.1 and 6.4.3 are only weakly

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-17

2022-01-26 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi Tom, As you may know, I as the editor of those I-Ds need to address the comments from the IETF community for preparing for the IESG review. If you have specific comments on I2NSF YANG Data Model Drafts to improve them, please let me know. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-17

2022-01-26 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
WG > decide. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:23 PM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < > jaehoon.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> Here is the revised draft of NSF-Facing Interface according to your >> comments: >> >>

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-17

2022-01-28 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
* Dan Romascanu > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 26, 2022 10:44 AM > *To:* Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong > *Cc:* General Area Review Team ; i2...@ietf.org; Last > Call ; > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [I2nsf] Genart last call review of > draft-i

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

2022-02-21 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi Dale, Thanks for your review confirmation on our I2NSF Monitoring Interface Data Model Draft. Best Regards, Paul On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:37 AM Dale R. Worley wrote: > "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" writes: > > Hi Dale and Tom, > > Here is the revised draft of I