Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-conex-tcp-modifications

different than a router that looks at a TCP port for an enforcing an ACL, right? Let me know what you think. (Especially, we would be grateful if you think there is a better solution we ought to be considering that would meet the requirements) Regards Suresh --

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

h "ignore any CDO in the outer header". Consider moving the description of the bits in the option type field, particularly the chg bit, earlier in the document. Right now, the first mention is in the security consideration section, and most of the definition doesn't happen unt

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03

Thanks for the review. > Am 30.06.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Robert Sparks : > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the I

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08

Thanks for the review! > Am 06.07.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Joel Halpern : > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. P

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis-05

Thanks for the review! > Am 24.05.2017 um 18:49 schrieb Stewart Bryant : > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04

Thanks for you review! I also noted your second point in my AD review to make sure it gets addressed! > Am 25.07.2017 um 23:36 schrieb Robert Sparks : > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review T

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03

Thanks for the review! > Am 22.06.2017 um 23:14 schrieb Joel Halpern : > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. P

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-dh-group-exchange-05

Hi Pete, thanks for the review. Will check about the pre-5378 boilerplate. Mirja > Am 25.07.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Pete Resnick : > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF d

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-modp-dh-sha2-07

Thanks for the review! > Am 31.07.2017 um 06:59 schrieb Orit Levin : > > Reviewer: Orit Levin > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Pleas

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ext-info-10

Thanks for the review and follow up! > Am 24.07.2017 um 23:02 schrieb Matthew Miller > : > > Reviewer: Matthew Miller > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > b

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-usage-04

Thanks Jari! I point to your review in my ballot comment because I would also like to see a reply! Mirja On 13.09.2017 20:34, Jari Arkko wrote: Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06

Hi Elwyn, thanks a lot for the detailed review! I fully agree and have mentioned your review in my ballot comments. I really hope they will address it and rewrite large parts respectively! Mirja On 23.09.2017 00:06, Elwyn Davies wrote: Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Not Ready I am

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-kille-ldap-xmpp-schema-05

Thanks for the review! On 20.09.2017 12:56, Stewart Bryant wrote: Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08

Thanks for the review. While the wg is only charter to produce exp RFCs, i agree that could be explained in the document as well. Haven commented on this in an updated ballot. Mirja On 19.09.2017 18:42, Dan Romascanu wrote: Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-19

Hi Dan, thanks for the review! My understanding is that your comments have all been addressed in the mean time, so I didn't note any thing further in my ballot position. Mirja On 22.08.2017 17:34, Dan Romascanu wrote: Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned