Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11

Great. Thanks! - Jouni On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:40 PM, "Black, David" wrote: > The -11 version of this draft addresses all of the nits and editorial comments > noted in the Gen-ART review of the -10 version. It's ready for publication as > an Informational RFC. > > Thanks, > --David > >> ---

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03

Thanks Alexey, We'll take care of these comments asap. - Jouni On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Please r

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03

Alexey, The review comments have been implemented and are visible in the github in-progress version: https://github.com/jounikor/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04.txt - Jouni On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04

Thanks Alexey. - Jouni On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19

Martin, Thanks for the detailed review. I'll let the authors respond to these if they have further questions or clarifications to ask. - Jouni On Sep 14, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the F

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12

Thanks David. - JOuni On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:57 AM, "Black, David" wrote: > And the -12 version is likewise ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Thanks, > --David > >> -Original Message- >> From: Black, David >> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:41 PM >> To: Ben Campbel

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Early Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-07

Thanks Ben for the review! - JOuni On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > This is an early review at WGLC la

Re: [Gen-art] [radext] Gen-Art Early Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-07

Ben, Alan just posted -08 revision. Could you check it whether all your concerns have been addressed and you are OK with the revision. - JOuni (doc shepherd) On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Ben Campbell wrote: >> *** Major issues: >> >> -- General: >> >> The draft needs an

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-10

I don't think there is anything that needs to be done for 2.2. It is a normal capability exchange type of mechanism. The text is IMHO clear: "in situations where the Attribute is required to provision service.." Then the lack of EAP-Key-Name means the service cannot be provisioned and the NAS ca

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-19

Martin, We'll check this again. Thanks. - Jouni On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I just read through the diff of -24. I'm assuming that my feedback > was lost somewhere. > > On 14 September 2013 09:41, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >> Martin, &g

[Gen-art] Gen_ART review of draft-santesson-auth-context-extension-10

ion-10 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: Oct-15-2015 IETF LC End Date: Oct-27-2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Comments: - I do not have deep expertise on the area this I-D covers. Having read it through and knowi

[Gen-art] Gen-RTP LC review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08

bis-08 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date:2015–12-21 IETF LC End Date: 2015–12-28 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with small nits to be corrected. Major issues: None. Minor issues: * The document seems to imply/assume that a DNS que

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-held-routing-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <​ http://wiki.too

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis-05

Resending from a proper email address.. sorry for duplicates. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis-05

Hi, > On 08 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Xing Li wrote: > > Hi, Jouni, > > Thank you very much for your review and comments. Please see inline. > > Jouni Korhonen 写道: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review >> Team >> (Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis-05

Hi, The proposed edits look good to me. Thanks. - jouni Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos.. On Mar 9, 2016, at 12:40 AM, Xing Li wrote: Hi，Jouni, Thanks. Please see inline. Jouni Korhonen 写道: Comments: * Lines 480 and 928 have "advertised MTU", which not really i

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-core-block-19 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 4/18/2016 IETF LC End Date: 4/12/2016 IESG Telechat date: 4/21/2016 Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: none. Minor issues: * The intoduction mentions that the block tra

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-core-block-19 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 4/18/2016 IETF LC End Date: 4/12/2016 IESG Telechat date: 4/21/2016 Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: none. Minor issues: * The intoduction mentions that the block tra

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

Carsten, See inline. 4/20/2016, 11:26 PM, Carsten Bormann kirjoitti: Jouni Korhonen wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

Hi Jouni, Just saying.. the use of NUM was not crystal clear just by reading the draft and not having the followed the core block development & discussion past few years. Thanks, Jouni 4/27/2016, 2:33 PM, Carsten Bormann kirjoitti: Hi Jouni, * The intoduction mentions that the bl

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-e2e-sec-req-04.txt

Thanks Christer, And sorry for not responding earlier.. See my comments inline. 5/7/2016, 7:48 AM, Christer Holmberg kirjoitti: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 7/6/2016 IETF LC End Date: 15-12-28 IESG Telechat date: 7/7/2016 Summary: Ready for publication. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None.

Re: [Gen-art] Generate review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 8/11/2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-12 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready with minor nits. Major issues: None. Minor issues: Read on.. Editorials/nits:

Re: [Gen-art] Generate review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16

ments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 8/11/2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-12 IESG Telechat da

Re: [Gen-art] Generate review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16

nts being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16 Reviewer: Joun

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 8/29/2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-24 IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01 Summary: Ready with nits. Note. I did not run these MIBs t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

see inline. 8/29/2016, 2:45 PM, Bill Fenner kirjoitti: On Aug 29, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-05 Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 9/23/2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-09-28 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: The draft needs some work. Major issues: I ha

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-03

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Review of draft-elie-nntp-tls-recommendations-04

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-05

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option: Minor and editorial

Hi, The text with Al’s revisions are looking good. I did some further editing & proposals to it - see below. The text is not exactly to a precision I was hoping for but I guess that when PDM gets used the actual test setup/profile would define & mandate a certain observing location. 3.5.2 PDM

Re: [Gen-art] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-09.txt

Thanks. I am OK with the new version. Thank you for going through this nits tweaking ;) - Jouni > On Mar 13, 2017, at 4:55 AM, nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com wrote: > > All, > > We believe that all comments have now been addressed with this new draft. > Please let us know if there are any

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-09

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-07

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-16

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-korhonen-mip4-service-06

Hi Spencer, Thanks for the review! See some comments inline. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Spencer Dawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-korhonen-mip4-service-06

Hi Spencer, On Dec 29, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: Hi, Jouni, Thanks for your quick response - I'm OK with most of your proposed changes. I should emphasize that my comments here are Last Call comments that you (and the document shepherd, and the AD) can decide to ignore -

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-nai-routing-02

Hi Peter, Thanks for the review. See my comments inline. On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:17 PM, McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.ht

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-nai-routing-02

. Everybody was equally unhappy ;) Cheers, Jouni -Pete jouni korhonen wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for the review. See my comments inline. On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:17 PM, McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt

Hi Spencer, Thanks for the review. See my responses inline. On Aug 4, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.htm

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt

Hi Spencer, Sorry for the lag.. sometimes holidays interfere working ;) See more comments inline. On Aug 6, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: Hi, Jouni, Thanks for the quick response. If I wasn't still jet-lagged, I could remember what I was thinking when I did the review :-) R

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt

t Hello, thanks for your Gen-ART review... one comment below: -Message d'origine- De : Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spen...@wonderhamster.org] Envoyé : lundi 10 août 2009 00:31 À : jouni korhonen Cc : draft-ietf-dime-pm...@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review Team Objet : Re: Gen-ART Re

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dime-nai-routing-02

the feature is ok if that is the will of the working group. -Pete jouni korhonen wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks for the review. See my comments inline. On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:17 PM, McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC & telechat review of draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-07.txt

Hi Brian, Thank you for the review. Regarding the issues see inline: > >1. There is no discussion of using Service Location Protocol (RFC 2165). >Maybe it is unsuitable, but that should be explained if so. SLP has never been brought up in any discussion regarding the I-D or LMA discovery in for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC & telechat review of draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-07.txt

and I am fine adding it. - Jouni > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 2010-10-21 10:36, jouni korhonen wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thank you for the review. Regarding the issues see inline: >> >>> 1. There is no discussion of using Service Location

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netext-redirect-07

Thanks Pete for extensive review. I'll come back to your major issues in a bit. - Jouni On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netext-redirect-07

Pete, See my comments inline: On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > Major issues: > > Section 5.4: > You should add a paragraph on the possibility of loops in the > LMA assignment operation and specify that the MAG must > take some action to detect and terminate such loops, such >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03

Hi Martin, Thank you for a thorough review! I have few comments/answers inline. On Aug 9, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Thomson, Martin wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03

Hi, On Aug 11, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Thomson, Martin wrote: > On 2011-08-09 at 18:28:05, jouni korhonen wrote: >>> It's easy to infer from reading further that "layer-2" implies "pre- >> IP", but that view is at odds with the view that other nodes >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art: Last call review of draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6-06

Hi Elwyn, Thanks you for you detailed review. See my comments/answers inline. On Jan 16, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art: Last call review of draft-ietf-netext-radius-pmip6-06

Hi, On Jan 16, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >>> s7: I am not sure if the various must's and may's ought to be MUST's and >>> MAY's. >>> > e.g s7.1 "This interface must support the transfer of > accounting records needed for service control and charging." > I couldn't decide whether

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04

Pete, Thanks for the review. Agree that in general having a hole in otherwise continuous prefix is guaranteed to cause always some undesired side effects. Regarding sending RAs I don't this it will be much of an issue, though. Assuming SLAAC is used, then the requesting router would anyway be s

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-03

Thanks Ben for a thorough review. Very good comments indeed. We'll come back to this in a bit.. you know -00 deadline approaching and such ;) - Jouni On 2/29/12 1:34 AM, "ext Ben Campbell" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the F

Re: [Gen-art] GenART last call review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03

Roni, Thanks for the review. We'll take care of the editorials. - Jouni On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Roni Even wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > . > > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-10.txt

Alexey, Thanks for the review. See some initial comments inline. On May 5, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please re

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2845bis-06

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-01

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-16

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-te-app-13

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-10

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-lisp-geo-13 ietf last call Genart review

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-geo Title: LISP Geo-Coordinates Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat