Thanks for that review.
To be clear, the following comments are mine, not agreed with the other authors
(though I have no reason to believe they would disagree with them).
I take your comment on the rational organisation. But that document is already
badly delayed, and delaying it further for s
Martin
Thanks you for your comments.
There are various contexts where an authority having access to the keys is
acceptable - I will just refer to the company I work for as working in a
possible field (as do several other MANET participants). If this were being
offered as the only way to do thi
les No: 1996687
-Original Message-
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thom...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 October 2014 19:31
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-ibs@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-manet-ibs-03
--! WARNING
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
-Original Message-
From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Sent: 27 October 2014 09:42
To: 'Martin Thomson'
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-ibs
11/25 and I am confident that you will
reach some agreement (if only agreement to disagree) by then. Until that time I
will enter a Discuss ballot to track this as an open issue.
Thanks,
Adrian
> ____________
> From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
> Sent: 27 Octobe
ed Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
-Original Message-
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thom...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 October 2014 23:41
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: ad
gh Aerospace Centre,
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
-Original Message-
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thom...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 October 2014 18:48
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-ietf-manet-ibs@tools.i
iginal Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 25 November 2014 15:21
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: Martin Thomson; draft-ietf-manet-ibs@tools.ietf.org;
adr...@olddog.co.uk; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-manet-ibs-03
arch Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
-Original Message-
From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2015 23:37
To: Gen Art; Dearlove, Christopher (UK); T. Clausen; Justin Dean; Alvaro
Retana; manet-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Pre-telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-tlv-na
s Applied Intelligence, Chelmsford Technology Park, Great Baddow,
>> Chelmsford, Essex CM2 8HN.
>> www.baesystems.com/ai
>> BAE Systems Applied Intelligence Limited Registered in England &
>> Wales No: 01337451 Registered Office: Surrey Research Park,
>> Guildford,
.com]
Sent: 14 May 2015 19:49
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK); Jari Arkko
Cc: Gen Art; T. Clausen; Justin Dean; Alvaro Retana; manet-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Pre-telechat review of draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-02
--! WARNING ! -- This message
origin
RFC 6130, which uses RFC 5497, offers the proposed value of 1/1024 second, and
RFC 7181 (OLSRv2), which in part extends RFC 6130, must use the same value.
1/1024 second is however only an example in RFC 5497.
So I would expect normal usage to be 1/1024 second, unless specifically decided
otherwi
rk, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com]
Sent: 15 June 2015 17:40
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK); Roni Even;
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot@tools.ietf.org
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of dr
Jumping in wearing document shepherd hat.
draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot, which got as far as -03, was
produced (I wasn’t an author). This described how, it said (I’m not doubting
that, just trying to be precise) management is currently usually done for
OLSRv2 and NHDP. Having just
Elwyn Davies
> s3.2: I do not know enough about the details of NHDP and OLSRv2 to know if
> this is a silly question: Would it be possible for a compromised node to
> perform hop-limit or hop-count modification attacks even with RFC 6183
> security in place just by modifying these fields and r
egistered Office: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
Sent: 20 December 2016 14:29
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK); gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats@ietf.org; ma...@ietf.org;
i...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Revi
Peter
Thanks you for your comments. I should note that the following comments are
mine, not yet consulted with my co-authors.
I'm going to mostly disagree with your disagreement about the indicated point
being an implementation issue. What matters is consistency at a router. Between
routers do
Peter
Having now worked through all of those, first particular thanks for the several
out-and-out errors caught. Second, my draft for review by my co-authors has a
mixture of accepted change (the largest group), not changed, and revised to a
third form (the second largest group). In particular,
Thank you for this, some comments below, marked CD> (Generally, where I haven't
commented, I think the point is good.)
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hannin
Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 25 April 2013 05:10
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-metrics-rationale@tools.ietf.org; General
Comments below, marked >>>. I think (though I need my co-authors to agree of
course) that a draft with these revisions (and any others we need) will be
appropriate following any other IETF LC comments.
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Netwo
Wassim
Thank you for that,
Christopher
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 | Fax:
22 matches
Mail list logo