Hi Stewart--
Thanks for this review.
On Tue 2021-11-16 06:55:33 -0800, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-samples-05
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2021-11-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-26
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
On Sun 2021-12-12 19:48:17 -0800, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi dkg,
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 03:11:56PM +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I appreciate your catching these unexpanded acronyms. I am happy to add
>> expansions for them, or maybe just outbound ref
Hi Linda--
Thanks for your review!
On Wed 2023-11-29 09:48:54 -0800, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote:
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Some of the steps described for "Confidentiality/authentication via
> Encryption"
> are not clear to me. Hope the authors can answers the following questions:
>
>
On Wed 2023-11-29 20:11:31 +, Linda Dunbar wrote:
> Thank you very much for the explanation. My puzzle is when the Sender using
> its Public Key to encrypt the Session Key, can anyone who have the access of
> the sender's Public Key decrypt the Session Key?
>
> Is it true that the Session Ke
Hi Paul--
Thanks for this review! I've just staged some minor cleanup edits in
git (https://gitlab.com/dkg/e2e-mail-guidance/) that should address your
concerns. After my co-editors have had a chance to review and discuss,
we'll probably roll them up with the suggestions from other reviewers
int
On Thu 2024-02-22 15:41:35 -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> But I do encourage you to say *something* about web server based email
> clients, since they are such a big part of the ecosystem. (What
> percentage of all emails have gmail on at least one end?) Perhaps
> discuss the limitations on secur
