Thank Francesca for the review. Comments inline.
> On Nov 2, 2018, at 12:14 PM, Francesca Palombini
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF do
Thanks Pete for the review i have addressed the nits, including the abundance
of MUSTs :) and will release in a next version 08 include other review comments.
-Chris
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Nit
Hi Dale,
Thank you very much for the very comprehensive review, comments inline:
> On Oct 20, 2022, at 11:23 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: On the Right Track
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review
Thanks Roni for the review.
Note, we did consider “subject” but decided that the context of “subject” is
different enough and generally a broader scope from the context of specific
usage and rules around “call reason” as defined in RCD that it was more
appropriate to define the new parameter
