Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay-10

Vijay: Hi! Thanks for your review! The registry has a FCFS registration policy, so at some point in the life of draft-sd-l2vpn-evpn-overlay the code points were requested — not necessarily in the draft itself. Even though draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay is tagged in the datatracker to have replace

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-03

[Author.] Peter: Thanks for the review! We’ll fold in changes as we get closer to the Telechat. Alvaro. On September 3, 2019 at 11:36:33 PM, Peter Yee via Datatracker (nore...@ietf.org) wrote: Document: draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits-03 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-drlb-13

On November 5, 2019 at 6:58:52 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: Pete: Hi! > Finally, my "interesting note": > > I see in the shepherd report: > > > > (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR > disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 > and BCP 79

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07

On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote: Theresa:  Hi!  Thanks you for the review! John:  Please make the changes below before the document is discussed by the IESG. Thanks!! Alvaro. ... > Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve" > in Secti

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi! Yes, we cannot specify something that routers unaware of this specification should or shouldn’t do. I believe that Elwyn’s point is this: *if a router supports this specification* then when would it not advertise the ELC? IOW, the specification only obviously applies to implementations that

Re: [Gen-art] BIER-TE looping example (was: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10)

On August 13, 2021 at 1:31:29 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: ... > I don't feel strongly about adding additional text in this case. If you > do, I would prefer framing it as accidental misconfiguration rather than > malicious. FWIW, I agree with Robert.  Also, there's text in the Security Consideration

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

On December 21, 2021 at 8:01:21 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote: Gyan: Hi!  Happy New Year! Thank you for the review! ... > Summary: ... The new BGP role capabilities mismatch code 2 subcode 8 > discussed on ML seems to have multiple implementations deployed and one > confined by Cisco. I agree that the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

On January 4, 2022 at 10:44:35 AM, Gyan Mishra wrote: Gyan: ... > > All capabilities are signaled in the OPEN, so there's no possibility > > for receiving a Role Capability afterwards. > > Gyan> Agreed. The multiple capabilities received is mentioned in the text, > Gyan> however as it’s signaled

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

On January 5, 2022 at 12:12:14 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote: Sriram: Hi! > [KS/AA]: That is interesting. We did already enhance the Role descriptions > [KS/AA]: as follows to add the import policy verbiage (to the already > [KS/AA]: existing export policy) in Sec. 2 of v-19 to be uploaded:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

On January 5, 2022 at 5:35:31 PM, Alexander Azimov wrote: Alexander: ... > > > [KS/AA]: That is interesting. We did already enhance the Role descriptions > > > [KS/AA]: as follows to add the import policy verbiage (to the already > > > [KS/AA]: existing export policy) in Sec. 2 of v-19 to be up

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-09

On April 12, 2022 at 3:14:41 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2022, at 22:35, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker wrote: Hi! Sorry I missed this before. ... > > Section 3 says: > > > > "If a LISP device receives a LISP message containing a Vendor Specific > > LCAF with an OUI that it does

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-null-register-packing-13

On February 17, 2023 at 11:17:10 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Behcet: Hi!  Thanks for your review! ... > Flag Bit 7 in PIM common header is defined as Capability bit but in Figure 1 > and throughout the draft it is marked as P bit not as C bit That is meant to be the Packed Capability, hence "P

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc8736bis-01

Thanks Mallory for the review! Alvaro. On May 16, 2023 at 8:49:43 AM, Mallory Knodel via Datatracker (nore...@ietf.org) wrote: Reviewer: Mallory Knodel Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-or-03

On 11/28/13 2:05 PM, "Christer Holmberg" wrote: Christer: Hi! Thanks for the review! >As an outsider, it is a little difficult for me to get a picture of >exactly how the document updates RFC 5820. Would it be possible to add a >few words to the last paragraph in the introduction. Something l

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03

On 6/15/15, 8:33 AM, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" mailto:chris.dearl...@baesystems.com>> wrote: Christopher: Hi! So I would expect normal usage to be 1/1024 second, unless specifically decided otherwise. I imagine that was implicitly assumed here, but could be said explicitly. Yes, please do

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

On 9/29/15, 9:50 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: Brian: >The AD Review asks for a number of changes. To be frank, it's a bit >annoying >to be asked to do a review of a draft that will change during the Last >Call. Yes, I apologize. The authors had the revision ready on Sep/25, but it wasn¹t sub

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-03

On 4/11/16, 12:30 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" wrote: Hi! >On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:54:06PM +, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) >wrote: >> Dan, >> >> Many thanks for this review! >> >> You raise two good questions, here¹s my take: >> I do not have a strong opinion one way or another ‹ I will leave this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-13

On 4/28/16, 4:24 PM, "Meral Shirazipour" mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Meral: Hi! Thank you for your review! I just posted version -14. Thanks! Alvaro. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents bei

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04

On 4/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" wrote: Les: Hi! > System-id duplication is a problem for any deployment - not just autoconfig > deployments. And it will be disruptive in any network until it is resolved. > > The only thing autoconfig has added is a way to resolve this w/o manual

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04

erstanding. > -Original Message- > From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:45 PM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Robert Sparks; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Genart last ca

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

On 5/2/17, 12:57 PM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote: Stewart: Hi! How are you? Thanks for the detailed review! > A significant part of the justification seems to evolve around the > inability of MPLS to function in an IPv6 only network. It seems to me that this statement summarizes many of the conce

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00

On 1/16/13 5:17 PM, "Ben Campbell" wrote: Ben: Hi! Sorry for the delay, my filters put this in a different place.. I'm explicitly adding the OSPF chairs. Comments below. >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00

On 4/16/13 8:04 AM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote: >We are still short of this text. > >I can add it as an editors note. Just give me a few lines >and I will put it on the telechat. Stewart: Here's the text to add to the last paragraph in section 1: For example, [I-D.ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-rout

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00

Just uploaded -03. Alvaro. On 4/16/13 7:27 PM, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" wrote: >If you can respin that would be cool. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art