[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-sieve-variables-07.txt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A quick gen-art review. One line summary: "Ready, with one nit." The nit is: In the 1st page header, it says: "Updates: 3028" In the Meta-info section, it says: This draft is intended to be an extension to the Sieve mail filtering language, available from the

[Gen-art] Re: Gen art review: draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-05.txt

Elwyn Davies wrote: Background for those on the CC list, who may be unaware of GenART: GenART is the Area Review Team for the General Area of the IETF. We advise the General Area Director (i.e. the IETF/IESG chair) by providing more in depth reviews than he could do himself of documents tha

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03

bis-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 30 August 2013 IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: 12 September 2013 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: In 1.1 This document complements the IPv6 node requirements [RFC6434] in places where clarific

[Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-resnick-retire-std1-01

retire-std1-01 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 8 September 2013 IETF LC End Date: 1 October 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Major/Minor/Nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04

bis-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 10 September 2013 IETF LC End Date: 2 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: 12 September 2013 Summary: Ready. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: None ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-07.txt

icated-access-07.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3 October 2013 IETF LC End Date: 27 September 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: None Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: In Section 1: the acronym VSP is not defined. (It is defined in a later section.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mile-sci-09

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-10-16 IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-22 Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a Standard Track document. Major issues: I have a couple of IANA related questions/comments about this document. I hope they would be easy to address.

Re: [Gen-art] Call for volunteers: httpbis document set

On 21/10/2013 18:34, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi all, The following httpbis documents are in Last Call: * draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging (82 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics (98 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional (27 pages) * draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range (24 pages) * dra

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05

eqt-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 4 November 2013 IETF LC End Date: 18 November 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational document. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-turner-ct-keypackage-receipt-n-error-algs-03

eipt-n-error-algs-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 4 November 2013 IETF LC End Date: 27 November 2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: none _

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mile-sci-11

On 17/10/2013 14:40, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may r

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-send-10

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-01-06 IETF LC End Date: 2013-12-23 IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-09 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: There were a couple of minor editorial issues like an

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01

bis-01 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-01-20 IETF LC End Date: 2014-01-22 IESG Telechat date: 2014-01-23 Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: o Label: This carries the fine-grained label identifier f

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16

On 17/09/2013 17:15, Andrew Allen wrote: Alexy Thank you for the review. My responses below prepended with [AA] Andrew -Original Message- From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:56 AM To: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01

Hi Donald, On 20/01/2014 16:45, Donald Eastlake wrote: Hi Alexey, Thanks for your review, see below: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/a

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

Hi Eliot, Mostly agreeing with you, but some corrections below: On 27/01/2014 13:00, Eliot Lear wrote: Hi Dave, First, thank you for your review. I personally appreciate to the time you put in to all of your reviews. On 1/27/14, 3:06 AM, Black, David wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:59, Barry Leiba wrote: >> Actually, I think I convinced Barry that it is updating RFC 2683. > > Yes: because the new line-length-limit recommendation is meant to > apply whether or not condstore or qresync are in play, this "updates" > remains (it's the others that used to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-09

Lear [mailto:l...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:01 AM To: Black, David; Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melni...@isode.com); dcridl...@arcode.com; General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org) Cc: Barry Leiba (barryle...@computer.org);i...@ietf.org;imap...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-ART revie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-03

On 25/02/2014 15:57, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-framework-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-cdni-framework-10. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is read

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12

rns-12.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 27 April 2014 IETF LC End Date: 25 April 2014 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: Ready with nits/questions. Major issues: None Minor issues: 13. User Agent Behaviour The User Agent (UA) MUST produce a reasonable rendering regardl

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12 and also Area Director's review

Hi Dale, > On 6 May 2014, at 19:53, wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > 2014-04-28 14:59 GMT+02:00 Alexey Melnikov : >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> <htt

Re: [Gen-art] [salud] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12 and also Area Director's review

Hi Dale, > On 7 May 2014, at 16:55, wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > [as an author] > >> From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" >> 13. User Agent Behaviour The User Agent (UA) MUST produce a reasonable rendering regardless of the combination of URIs (of any scheme

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-17

ast-17 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: May 26, 2014 IETF LC End Date: May 26, 2014 Summary: Nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: In the document, I am seeing: 5.1.1.1. Version (V) [And in several other similar sections] The protocol version number fo

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-p2psip-self-tuning-12

p2psip-self-tuning-12 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2014-06-11 IETF LC End Date: 2014-06-11 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standard Track RFC. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-17

number version comes along, and those implementations handle other version numbers, while being able to downgrade to 0... Jari On 26 May 2014, at 10:47, Alexey Melnikov mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For ba

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-questions-06

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 9 July 2014 IETF LC End Date: 1 July 2014 IESG Telechat date: 10 July 2014 This document is ready as an Informational. This is a fine document, I feel much wiser for it :-). My only comment is about use of a downref to a draft. Basically I agree with Barry

[Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-pmsi-registry-03.txt

try-03 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 9-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None ___ G

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

lay-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3 August 2014 IETF LC End Date: 21 July 2014 IESG Telechat date: 7 August 2014 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC. [Ready with nits] Major issues: None Minor issues: Section 6.4: who allocated opcodes? I.e. is there a re

[Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt

nts-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC [ready with comments] Major issues: None Minor issues: In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mention

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-loss-delay-05

On 04/08/2014 18:16, Donald Eastlake wrote: Hi Alexey, Hi Donald, On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-03.txt

03.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 1 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 7 October 2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: none (I didn't check the math, but it looke

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-07.txt

07.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 1 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 11 September 2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready with nits Major issues: none Minor issues: I would like to understand how a document registering ARIA ciphers can have an Informative (and not a Normative) refere

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-08.txt

08.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 30 October 2014 IETF LC End Date: 24 October 2014 IESG Telechat date: 30 October 2014 Summary: Ready (with nits) Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: On page 6 the first reference to UTF-8 needs a Normative Ref

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-pcp-server-selection-07

ion-07 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-04 IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-07 IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-22 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ie

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-iab-iana-principles-02

viewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-04 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: Ready for publication as IAB Informational document. Major/minor/nits: none ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listin

[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05

policy-considerations-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-01-08 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-01 IESG Telechat date: 2015-01-08 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard (with nits) Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits: In various sections: first references to: Netconf, SSH, TL

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

try-02 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-02-11 IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-16 IESG Telechat date: N/A. Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track RFC (with nits). Major issues: Minor issues: In Section 4: "LSF" is used for the first time without b

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11

ion-11 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-02-11 IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-04 IESG Telechat date: 2015-03-05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Thank you for writing this document, I quite enjoyed reading it. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial co

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

Hi Tom, On 11/02/2015 21:14, Tom Haynes wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for the review. Comments inline. Tom On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

Hi Tom, On 16/02/2015 17:55, Thomas Haynes wrote: On Feb 16, 2015, at 3:17 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Tom, On 11/02/2015 21:14, Tom Haynes wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for the review. Comments inline. Tom On Feb 11, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: [snip] In Section 5: Label

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-04.txt

tf-pim-rfc4601bis-04.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015/03/11 IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/12 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Internet Standard RFC. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-09

cm-use-cases-09 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-04-08 IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-16 IESG Telechat date: 2015-04-09 Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: None Nits: In Section 2.1.1: >* Guidance that specifies how old collected data can be to be >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IESG Telechat re-review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04

My earlier Gen-Art review comments were addressed, so the document is now ready for publication. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

Hi Robert, On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses (or strings t

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10

idr-ls-distribution-10.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-08 IESG Telechat date: N/A My apologies for the late review of this document. Summary: Ready with nits Minor (but some of these might be more serious): In 6.2.2: If an implementation of BGP-LS det

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10

draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-04-08 IESG Telechat date: N/A My apologies for the late review of this document. Summary: Ready with nits Minor (but some of these might be more serious): In 6.2.2: If an implementation

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-06

uth-06.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-05-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-05-04 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04

f-bmwg-traffic-management-04 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 27 May 2015 IETF LC End Date: 20 April 2015 IESG Telechat date: 28 May 2015 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: HTTP, SMTP, FTP, etc. deserve Informational references the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. This review is in response to a request for early Gen-ART review. Document: draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

On 09/06/2015 13:13, Barry Leiba wrote: Major Concerns: What is the justification for having the "plain" verifier? If one is intercepted by a malicious application, your extension becomes pointless. Yes, this is what my DISCUSS is about. I'm glad to have support for that view. Very much so. I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

Hi John, On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrote: I believe that the other comments were all-ready addressed in draft 12 as a result of Ben Laurie’s comments from last week. If Alexey can double check that I got everything that would be great. I re-worked those sections to capture Ben’s comm

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-spop-11

that is no reason to do more work for less security. I hope that helps explain the logic. This is fine, but I wish you've said that in the document! This was not clear. Regards John B. On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:57 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi John, On 11/06/2015 13:51, John Bradley wrot

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-08

ity-08.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-06-25 IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-18 IESG Telechat date: 2015-06-25 Summary: Ready with nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: In Section 3.3 - did you mean R5 when talking about P5? I've searched multiple times and couldn't find i

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-05

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc-05 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-10 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-04 IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC. Although I

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-15 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2015-12-17 Summary: Nearly ready for publication as Proposed Standard I thin

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19

I deleted an incorrect recipient in my original review. Sorry about that. > On 15 Dec 2015, at 11:19, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IE

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Hi Ralph, Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. On 09/12/2015 20:47, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: Nits/editorial comments: Nicely written, very clear document. Thank you. idnits reports some lines too long and an unused reference. I fixed the reference in my copy. I hope RFC Ed

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Hi Ralph, On 16/12/2015 16:19, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Ralph, Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier. You're welcome. Looks like we have agreement on my editorial comments and suggestions. Will the

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2015-12-23 IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-23 IESG Telechat date: (if known) N/A Summary: Ready with a couple of minor points that need

Re: [Gen-art] [imapext] FW: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07

Hi Jay, On 29/12/2015 00:10, Jayantheesh S B wrote: Thanks Peter. Addressed you comments in the attached version. The changes look good to me. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Yoshi, > On 2 Jan 2016, at 09:20, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > Thanks for the comments. > >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Alexey Melnikov >> wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >&

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Yoshi, On 02/01/2016 23:03, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote: Hi Alexey, On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Alexey Melnikov mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>> wrote: Hi Yoshi, On 2 Jan 2016, at 09:20, Yoshifumi Nishida mailto:nish...@sfc.wide.ad.jp>> wrote: Hi Alexey,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Karen, On 05/01/2016 10:42, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen wrote: HI, Please find some feedback below. BR, Karen *From:*Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com <mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com>] *Sent:* 4. januar 2016 11:48 *To:* Yoshifumi Nishida <ma

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-threats-14

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lisp-threats-14 Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2016/01/17 IETF LC End Date: 2016/01/15 IESG Telechat date: 2016/01/21 Summary: Ready. This is a well written document and I enjoyed read

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04

Hi Roni, On 30/03/2016 15:21, Roni Even wrote: Hi, Adding Alissa to the thread We had a similar issue with draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp . The result was to downgrade from Standard to Informational. This required to go back to the WG. I also noted that there is some text in section one that l

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03

Hi Dan, Thank you for your review. On 21/06/2016 12:48, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like an

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

On 29/06/2016 14:44, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: Hi, There was no update to this document since my previous review. My original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the document status (should it be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Hi, On 05/07/2016 18:25, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: Hi Vijay, I will appreciate if the "including 'urn:eidr:'" part made it into the draft. Ok. BTW, should I plan on creating a new I-D before the scheduled telechat, or after? You can post a new version any time. Before the telechat would

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Hi Christer, Thank you for your comments. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

xt should > not only cover the technical changes (syntax etc), but also if there > are changes regarding the usage etc. I think this is fair. I will let the editor come up with some proposal. Best Regards, Alexey > Regards, > > Christer > > > *From: *Alexey Mel

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02

Hi Peter, > On 10 Dec 2016, at 19:32, Peter Yee wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This draft is looking better than the first two. It's in line with > the other structured syntax suffix drafts. The only comment I have > is: > > Page 4, IANA Considerations, C

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-11

Hi Paul, I am not an author, but let me disagree with one of your reported issues: > On 14 Sep 2017, at 16:45, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > (2) MAJOR: Name or query? > > A URN is by definition a *name*. Some parts of this document do focus on the > lex URN as a name. But the document also proposes

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Paul, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of > -05: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > about the ABNF that was my primary concern in my prior wglc review of > -05: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on > > draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06. I see that nothing has been done > > ab

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, at 03:00 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > On 9/19/17 5:42 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > >> I'm on tap to do the genart telechat review on &

Re: [Gen-art] draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06 and RFCs 5536 & 5322

Hi Paul, > On 19 Sep 2017, at 21:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > >> On 9/19/17 2:41 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: >> On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:23, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>optional-field =/ *( approved / >>archive / >>

Re: [Gen-art] [taugh.com-standards] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-12

Hi John, On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 8:38 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > > Pete, thanks for your review. I think the whole point of chartering DCRUP > > was to produce documents such as this. > > John, thanks for updating to reference RFC 8174, although I agree with Adam > > that the boilerplate shoul

Re: [Gen-art] [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-replace-01

Hi all, On 24/10/2018 11:55, Alissa Cooper wrote: Robert, thanks for your review. I flagged it in my ballot since there has been no response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Actually, this change has an error and should instead be: uid =/ "UID" SP replace Best Regards, Alexey On Oct 12,

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-07

Spencer Dawkins wrote: I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Summary: This document is on the right track for publication as a Proposed Standard. Most of my co

[Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-imapext-condstore-08.txt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Background for those who may be unaware of GenART: GenART is the Area Review Team for the General Area of the IETF. We advise the General Area Director (i.e. the IETF/IESG chair) by providing more in depth reviews than he could do himself of documents that come up for f

[Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-imapext-condstore-08.txt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first portion of Section 2 is unclear as to whether it is describing the elsewhere-specified behavior of IMAP vs. imposing new requirements. A check of RFC 3501 indicates that the entire notion of mod-sequence is new to this draft. The first sentence of the second p

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

Gray, Eric wrote: Below are my comments on the specified document, which I am submitting as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-i

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

Gray, Eric wrote: --- [SNIP] --- --> My answers are below, please let me know if you have any --> further questions. --> --> >Questions/Comments: --> >== --> > --> > In section 2.1, you say that spaces are acceptable (MUST --> > be always allowed) in flag names. You also sa

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

Gray, Eric wrote: -->The Sieve interpreter SHOULD check the list of flags for validity as -->described by [IMAP] ABNF. In particular according to [IMAP] non-ASCII -->characters are not allowed in flag names. However spaces MUST be always -->allowed in strings representing a list

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-04.txt

Ken Murchison wrote: Thanks for the comments. My responses are interspersed below. Hi, Just a couple of additional comments. Sharon Chisholm wrote: Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-04.txt

Ken Murchison wrote: Alexey Melnikov wrote: 5. The section "Meta-information on this document" provides some information that presumably the RFC editor is to remove. The section is not very specific on exactly what information needs to get removed and by whom. The RFC editor w

[Gen-art] [Fwd: Re: Gen-art review of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-04.txt]

--- Begin Message --- Ken Murchison wrote: Thanks for the comments. My responses are interspersed below. Hi, Just a couple of additional comments. Sharon Chisholm wrote: Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART,

[Gen-art] Re: Re-review of draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-05.txt

Sharon Chisholm wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for: draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-05.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may r

Re: [Gen-art] Re: Re-review of draft-ietf-sieve-rfc3598bis-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter wrote: 1. I still find the use of quotation marks within this document awkward and distracting, but think there has been improvement in using double quotes for quoted strings and single quotes for terms. I think though that losing the quotes altogether for terms would be a bi

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-melnikov-imap-expunged-01.txt

Elwyn Davies wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these (slightly belated - sorry) comments along with any other Last Call com

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-09.txt

Sharon Chisholm wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-09.txt

Sharon Chisholm wrote: Hi Hi Sharon, 4. In section 2.4.2.1, first paragraph it says "Implementations are encouraged to use short-circuit evaluation in these cases." This seems an arbitrary and somewhat obvious bit of implementation advice. This text is trying to say that im

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-09.txt

Sharon Chisholm wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis-07.txt

Suresh Krishnan wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis-07.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Su

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-body-06.txt

Elwyn Davies wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Hi, Thanks for the comments. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-08

Spencer Dawkins wrote: Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-08 Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins Review Date: 2007-08-02 IETF LC End Date: 2007-06-28 (yes, this review is late). IESG Telechat date: 2007-08-23 Hi Spencer, Thank you for the review. Summary: This document is close to being ready for

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-08

other Last Call comments (talk to your document shepherd). Thanks, Spencer From: "Alexey Melnikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Spencer Dawkins wrote: Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-08 Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins Review Date: 2007-08-02 IETF LC End Date: 2007-06-28 (yes, this revi

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-09

Spencer Dawkins wrote: Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-09 Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins Review Date: 2007-08-17 IETF LC End Date: 2007-06-28 (for 08) IESG Telechat date: 2007-08-23 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Comments: My questions and comments

  1   2   3   >