Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt

Hi Suresh, Jari, I am traveling this week and fully engaged in other activities. We plan to address comments next week. Thanks, Acee On 10/30/14, 3:58 AM, "Jari Arkko" wrote: >Thanks for your review, Suresh. > >I agree that the two issues from Section 2 should be fixed. Authors? > >Jari > ___

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt

Hi Suresh, Thanks much for your comments. See inline. On 10/28/14, 3:22 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > >Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09

Hi Jari, Martin, With respect to a description of how the measurements are obtained, the document does state that this is out of scope (from the abstract): Note that this document only covers the mechanisms by which network performance information is distributed. The mechanisms for measuri

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autconfig-11

Thanks Much Robert, Acee On 1/16/15, 10:58 AM, "Robert Sparks" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >. > >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Ca

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Suresh, I thought Peter had addressed your comments. See inline. On 8/18/15, 10:14 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > >Please wait for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Suresh, On 8/19/15, 10:31 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >Hi Acee, > I checked out the changes in the new version (12) and they look good. >Thanks a lot for taking care of the changes. Only one pending comment >from me. I will send in a new review. > >On 08/1

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06: [1] Operational Considerations

Hi Bruno, Did you see the action item below? It seems we are very close. Thanks, Acee On 10/8/15, 2:03 PM, "Black, David" wrote: >The new Operational Considerations text that Shradda sent out looks good. > >I'd like to make one small change to avoid overusing the concept of >preference/prefer

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-04

Hi Dan, Thanks for the review - please see inline. From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" mailto:droma...@avaya.com>> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 12:15 PM To: General Area Review Team mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis@tools.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

Hi Brian, Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I discussed your comments this morning. See responses to your major/minor comments below. We will incorporate all the nits. On 8/6/16, 9:38 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

Hi Brian, See one inline. On 8/8/16, 4:18 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >Hi Acee, > >Thanks, just a few points in line: > >On 09/08/2016 05:47, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I dis

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

date" part). >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-07 >> >> Thanks. >> Jeffrey >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 5:0

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-09

Thanks Brian - we will remove RFC 5340. Acee On 10/6/16, 3:43 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from yo

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

Hi Greg, Although it is a bit late, we’ve had some discussions amongst the IS-IS and OSPF chairs and are wondering whether the interface capability belongs in the IGPs. This will be flooded throughout the entire routing domain – is it really needed on every node or will it the RTM testing be in

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

uld not depend on an omniscient NMS client distributing information about capabilities of each node to each other node. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com<mailto:alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com> From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gr

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

ity to OSPF. I’m sorry but I focused mainly on the OSPF protocol aspects then and didn’t question the use case. This question came up in the IS-IS WG discussions. Thanks, Acee Yours Irrespectively, John From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:38

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

c7883 (Les, you co-authored the same!!) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7880 -- Uma C. From: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:25 AM To: John E Drake <mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <mailto:a...

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

re about it. >> >> >> >>Les >> >> >> >> *From:*John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net] >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:54 AM >> *To:* Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky; Les >> Ginsberg (ginsberg)

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-17

Hi Matt, Thanks for the review. On 4/7/17, 1:58 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: >Reviewer: Matthew Miller >Review result: Almost Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF C

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

Hi Pete, On 8/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: >Reviewer: Pete Resnick >Review result: Almost Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

On 8/21/17, 12:12 PM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: >On 21 Aug 2017, at 10:58, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > >> Hi Pete, >> >> On 8/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Pete Resnick" >> wrote: >> >>> Reviewer: Pete Resnick >>> Review result: A

Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

Hi Pete, One more inline since Xiaohu must have missed your other comment. On 8/23/17, 9:21 PM, "Xuxiaohu" wrote: > > >> -邮件原件----- >> 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] >> 发送时间: 2017年8月22日 2:45 >> 收件人: Pete Resnick >> 抄送: gen-a

Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

a Atlas mailto:akat...@gmail.com>>, Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Resent-Date: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 3:59 PM On 24 Aug 2017, at 11:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: For 1, 2, 6, and 7, that's easy; the drafts defining the values can do the registrations. For 5, the re

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

On 10/5/17, 7:05 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Dan Romascanu" wrote: >Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >Review result: Ready with Issues > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Ple

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

to the last paragraph of the Security Considerations document. It seems to me that non-mandatory counting or logging of malformed TLVs or Sub-TLVs may not be sufficient to protect against a large scale DoS attack. Regards, Dan On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) ma

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

f.org>>, OSPF WG List mailto:o...@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19 Hi Acee, Indeed, that was the intention of my comment. Thanks and Regards, Dan On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Hi Joel, On 1/4/18, 6:32 PM, "Joel Halpern" wrote: >Reviewer: Joel Halpern >Review result: Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Hi Les, From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 9:26 PM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, "Joel M. Halpern" mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>, "gen-art@ietf.org" mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>> Cc: OSPF WG List mailto:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11 Ketan – “maintenance” I could live with. “GIR” seems to not be generic enough. Les From: Ketan T

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

tf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>" mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11 How about “graceful-link-shutdown” ?

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

link-shutdown” ? Looks good to me. Also, FYI, for BGP sessions, in the GROW WG we used the term “Graceful BGP session shutdown” and named the BGP community “GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN” so this would align on the terminology. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-13 Best regards, --Bru

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06

Thanks Francis! Acee On 1/23/18, 5:55 PM, "Francis Dupont" wrote: Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

Hi Francis, Thanks for the review. See inline. On 1/26/18, 3:29 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote: Hi Francis, > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IET

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-10

Hi Peter, Thanks for the review, please see inline. On 1/31/18, 2:44 PM, "Peter Yee" wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proces

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-10

I appreciate you addressing my comments (tardy as they were). -Peter -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 3:02 PM To: Peter Yee; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ie

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-11

Hi Peter, On 2/2/18, 1:47 AM, "Peter Yee" wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait fo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Elwyn, On 2/15/18, 2:12 PM, "Elwyn Davies" wrote: Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chai

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Bruno, On 2/16/18, 9:00 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: Hi Elwyn, Acee, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline [Bruno] > -Original Message- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] > Sent:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Elwyn, Also thank you much for your editorial comments. I must say I'm surprised that we didn’t catch some of these before. We will adopt most of them. One thing I'm not clear on is why you believe we should change RECOMMENDED to lowercase in the deployment recommendations. Unless convinced

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21

Hi Peter, Thanks for thoroughly reviewing this document again and finding the nits. I incorporated all your comments other than adding "positive" as while it is more precise, it reads better without it and we don't want to imply that a TLV length could ever be negative. See attached diff. Than

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19

Hi Pete, On 12/3/18, 2:19 PM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Cha

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

Hi Erik, Thanks for the review. The nits will be fixed in the -24 version. Thanks, Acee On 7/17/19, 7:08 PM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Erik Kline Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review T

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37

Thanks Stewart - we will fix this nit in the -38 version. Acee On 9/18/19, 10:14 AM, "Stewart Bryant via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

HI Padma, Mohit, From: Padma Pillay-Esnault Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:17 PM To: Mohit Sethi Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" , "l...@ietf.org" , Padma Pillay-Esnault Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

See one inline. From: Acee Lindem Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:39 PM To: Padma Pillay-Esnault , Mohit Sethi Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" , "l...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbi

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11

Hi Mohit, Speaking as document shepherd. See inline. On 4/24/20, 3:39 AM, "Mohit Sethi via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Mohit Sethi Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF docum

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11

pls-elc-11 HI Acee, On 4/24/20 3:38 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Hi Mohit, Speaking as document shepherd. See inline. On 4/24/20, 3:39 AM, "Mohit Sethi via Datatracker" <mailto:nore...@ietf.org> wrote: Reviewer: Mohit Sethi Review result: Ready with Nits

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi Elwyn, On 5/11/20, 2:10 PM, "Elwyn Davies" wrote: Hi, Peter. In the light of some of your responses here, I would just like to clarify that one of the reasons for gen-art reviews is to try and make extremely complicated technical documents more accessible for those who

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

MSD or advertisement of the OSPF capability is not supported. Although I might not have worded it as such, that was clear to me from the text. Feel free to recommend alternate text if you feel it is necessary. Thanks, Acee Thanks! Alvaro. On May 11, 2020 at 3:18:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (

Re: [Gen-art] [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

lf Of Alvaro Retana Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:46 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; Elwyn Davies ; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: l...@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13 Hi! Y

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12

Hi Linda, One more point... On 6/9/20, 4:52 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote: Linda, On 09/06/2020 02:37, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Peter, > > Thank you very much for adding the extra text to explain. > > But SR is supposed to be transparent to all intermediate nodes. Does y

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06

Hi Paul, On 9/20/22, 1:42 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" wrote: Ketan, On 9/20/22 10:30 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > 1) NIT: 1 Introduction > > IDNITS reports: > > -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. > 'IEEE802.1AX'