Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt

Hi Brian, Thanks much for the review. I believe I've added all your comments - see inline. On 11/12/13 11:16 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >[Resending again with abject apologies for a typo in the To address.] > >[Resending with CC to the IETF list, since the ospf WG list >automatically rejec

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-cap-09.txt

additional capabilities are proposed for advertisement. Security considerations for the base OSPF protocol are covered in [OSPF] and [OSPFV3]. Thanks, Acee Lindem (Editor), et al. Expires June 1, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been s

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07

Hi Ben, I believe I've addressed your editorial comments and will send a draft copy to yourself and the other authors (not ietf.org). The updated version will also include Nischal Seth's comment regarding the wording inadvertently precluding OSPF point-to-point over LAN interfaces. With re

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-area-adj-07

Hi Ben, Based on this list, should I remove the expansion of OSPF? Since it is only the first occurrence, I'm not that concerned either way. Thanks, Acee On Mar 20, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > If in doubt, expand acronyms. > > But see also http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-18

Hi Christian, Thanks taking the time to review this large document. See inline. On Apr 10, 2008, at 6:05 AM, Christian Vogt wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-update-18

2008, at 3:38 PM, Christian Vogt wrote: Hi Acee, thanks for addressing these comments. Your explanation regarding virtual links is convincing, so the corresponding text should be left as is in the document. Take care, - Christian On Apr 14, 2008, at 19:38, Acee Lindem wrote: Hi Chri

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-01

On Jul 13, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Abhay Roy wrote: Thanks for a quick check.. Comments inline.. On 7/13/2009 2:22 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: This is an update to my gen-art review of draft-ietf-ospf-manet- or-01, reflecting version 02 of the same dr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-08

Hi Pete, Thanks for the review and editorial comments. These will be incorporated in the -09 version of the draft. Thanks, Acee On Jan 18, 2012, at 4:54 AM, Pete McCann wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wik

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-iid-registry-update-00

I think the draft can talk to the motivation in general terms with the embedded routing draft cited as an example. Thanks, Acee On 3/6/13 7:01 AM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote: >Chairs > >Please can you re on the question posed by Alvaro below. > >Do you have any objection to adding motivation text to

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-05

Hi Gyan, Thanks for the review. Acee > On Apr 27, 2023, at 6:00 PM, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processe

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-14

In any case, I’m not enamored with the line numbers in the pseudo code (irrespective of whether or not they are adoring). These were introduced in RFC 5798 but I don’t see any references to these line numbers (as their existence would imply) and unless anyone sees compelling reason to keep them,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-14

Hi Vijay, The line numbers are removed in the -15 version of the draft. Thanks, Acee > On Dec 18, 2023, at 2:04 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > In any case, I’m not enamored with the line numbers in the pseudo code > (irrespective of whether or not they are adoring). These were i

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-14

> On Jan 4, 2024, at 07:00, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for > this document. Yes - it was good to get rid of the line numbers in the normative pseudocode as they served no purpose. Thanks, Acee > > Lars > > >> On Dec 18

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-27

Thanks for the review Meral!!! See one inline. > On Jan 25, 2024, at 00:05, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF docume

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-39

PF neighbors adjacent to the restarting router (which is not the case). Thanks, Acee > Yours, > > Joel > > On 12/13/2024 4:54 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: >> Hi Joel, >> >> Thanks for the review. >> >>> On Dec 5, 2024, at 14:09, Joel Halpern via Da

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-39

Hi Joel, Thanks for the review. > On Dec 5, 2024, at 14:09, Joel Halpern via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being pro

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-24

Hi Robert, Thanks for the review! Acee > On Jan 11, 2025, at 14:40, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proc

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-33

Thanks Gyan!!! > On Jan 27, 2025, at 18:50, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IET

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-15

Hi Mallory, Thanks for your review. I've incorporated your comments in the -16 version. > On Dec 27, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Mallory Knodel via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Mallory Knodel > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt

Hi Suresh, Jari, I am traveling this week and fully engaged in other activities. We plan to address comments next week. Thanks, Acee On 10/30/14, 3:58 AM, "Jari Arkko" wrote: >Thanks for your review, Suresh. > >I agree that the two issues from Section 2 should be fixed. Authors? > >Jari > ___

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09.txt

Hi Suresh, Thanks much for your comments. See inline. On 10/28/14, 3:22 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > >Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09

Hi Jari, Martin, With respect to a description of how the measurements are obtained, the document does state that this is out of scope (from the abstract): Note that this document only covers the mechanisms by which network performance information is distributed. The mechanisms for measuri

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autconfig-11

Thanks Much Robert, Acee On 1/16/15, 10:58 AM, "Robert Sparks" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >. > >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Ca

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Suresh, I thought Peter had addressed your comments. See inline. On 8/18/15, 10:14 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > >Please wait for

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-10.txt

Hi Suresh, On 8/19/15, 10:31 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: >Hi Acee, > I checked out the changes in the new version (12) and they look good. >Thanks a lot for taking care of the changes. Only one pending comment >from me. I will send in a new review. > >On 08/1

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06: [1] Operational Considerations

Hi Bruno, Did you see the action item below? It seems we are very close. Thanks, Acee On 10/8/15, 2:03 PM, "Black, David" wrote: >The new Operational Considerations text that Shradda sent out looks good. > >I'd like to make one small change to avoid overusing the concept of >preference/prefer

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-04

Hi Dan, Thanks for the review - please see inline. From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" mailto:droma...@avaya.com>> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 12:15 PM To: General Area Review Team mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis@tools.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

Hi Brian, Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I discussed your comments this morning. See responses to your major/minor comments below. We will incorporate all the nits. On 8/6/16, 9:38 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

Hi Brian, See one inline. On 8/8/16, 4:18 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >Hi Acee, > >Thanks, just a few points in line: > >On 09/08/2016 05:47, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Thanks much for the thorough review. Jeffrey and I dis

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-05

date" part). >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-07 >> >> Thanks. >> Jeffrey >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 5:0

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-09

Thanks Brian - we will remove RFC 5340. Acee On 10/6/16, 3:43 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote: >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from yo

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

Hi Greg, Although it is a bit late, we’ve had some discussions amongst the IS-IS and OSPF chairs and are wondering whether the interface capability belongs in the IGPs. This will be flooded throughout the entire routing domain – is it really needed on every node or will it the RTM testing be in

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

insberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>> Cc: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, Robert Sparks mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com>>, "m...@ietf.org<mailto:m...@ietf.org>" mailto:m...@ietf.org>>, "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>&q

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

Hi John, From: John E Drake mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>> Date: Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 10:43 AM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, Alexander Vainshtein mailto:alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com>>, Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>, "Les Gins

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

;>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>, John E Drake mailto:jdr...@juniper.net>>, Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, Alexander Vainshtein mailto:alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com>>, Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> Cc: "

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

re about it. >> >> >> >>Les >> >> >> >> *From:*John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net] >> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:54 AM >> *To:* Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky; Les >> Ginsberg (ginsberg)

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-17

Hi Matt, Thanks for the review. On 4/7/17, 1:58 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: >Reviewer: Matthew Miller >Review result: Almost Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF C

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

Hi Pete, On 8/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: >Reviewer: Pete Resnick >Review result: Almost Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

On 8/21/17, 12:12 PM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: >On 21 Aug 2017, at 10:58, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > >> Hi Pete, >> >> On 8/21/17, 11:40 AM, "Pete Resnick" >> wrote: >> >>> Reviewer: Pete Resnick >>> Review result: A

Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

Hi Pete, One more inline since Xiaohu must have missed your other comment. On 8/23/17, 9:21 PM, "Xuxiaohu" wrote: > > >> -邮件原件----- >> 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] >> 发送时间: 2017年8月22日 2:45 >> 收件人: Pete Resnick >> 抄送: gen-a

Re: [Gen-art] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06

From: Pete Resnick mailto:presn...@qti.qualcomm.com>> Date: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 3:59 PM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Cc: Xiaohu Xu mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com>>, "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>" mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

On 10/5/17, 7:05 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Dan Romascanu" wrote: >Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >Review result: Ready with Issues > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Ple

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

...@gmail.com>> Date: Saturday, October 7, 2017 at 1:57 AM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>" mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-os

Re: [Gen-art] [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-19

Hi Dan, Great – we’ll address that with your other comments. Thanks, Acee From: Dan Romascanu mailto:droma...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, October 9, 2017 at 1:58 PM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>" mailto:gen-art@i

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Hi Joel, On 1/4/18, 6:32 PM, "Joel Halpern" wrote: >Reviewer: Joel Halpern >Review result: Ready > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Hi Les, From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 9:26 PM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, "Joel M. Halpern" mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>>, "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

hanks, Acee From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 11:56 PM To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>, Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, "Joel M. Halpern" mailto:j...

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Works for me. Acee From: Shraddha Hegde mailto:shrad...@juniper.net>> Date: Friday, January 5, 2018 at 11:15 AM To: Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" mailto:ket...@ci

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Hi Pushpasis, Shraddha, et al, From: Pushpasis Sarkar mailto:pushpasis.i...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:22 PM To: Bruno Decraene mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Cc: Shraddha Hegde mailto:shrad...@juniper.net>>, Acee Lindem mailto:a...@cisco.com>>,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06

Thanks Francis! Acee On 1/23/18, 5:55 PM, "Francis Dupont" wrote: Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

Hi Francis, Thanks for the review. See inline. On 1/26/18, 3:29 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote: Hi Francis, > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IET

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-10

Hi Peter, Thanks for the review, please see inline. On 1/31/18, 2:44 PM, "Peter Yee" wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proces

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-10

I appreciate you addressing my comments (tardy as they were). -Peter -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 3:02 PM To: Peter Yee; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: i...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ie

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-11

Hi Peter, On 2/2/18, 1:47 AM, "Peter Yee" wrote: Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait fo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Elwyn, On 2/15/18, 2:12 PM, "Elwyn Davies" wrote: Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chai

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Bruno, On 2/16/18, 9:00 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: Hi Elwyn, Acee, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see inline [Bruno] > -Original Message- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] > Sent:

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-backoff-algo-07

Hi Elwyn, Also thank you much for your editorial comments. I must say I'm surprised that we didn’t catch some of these before. We will adopt most of them. One thing I'm not clear on is why you believe we should change RECOMMENDED to lowercase in the deployment recommendations. Unless convinced

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-21

Hi Peter, Thanks for thoroughly reviewing this document again and finding the nits. I incorporated all your comments other than adding "positive" as while it is more precise, it reads better without it and we don't want to imply that a TLV length could ever be negative. See attached diff. Than

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19

Hi Pete, On 12/3/18, 2:19 PM, "Pete Resnick" wrote: Reviewer: Pete Resnick Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Cha

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-yang-23

Hi Erik, Thanks for the review. The nits will be fixed in the -24 version. Thanks, Acee On 7/17/19, 7:08 PM, "Erik Kline via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Erik Kline Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review T

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37

Thanks Stewart - we will fix this nit in the -38 version. Acee On 9/18/19, 10:14 AM, "Stewart Bryant via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

nart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10 Resent-From: Resent-To: Keyur Patel , , , , Yingzhen Qu , Christian Hopps , Acee Lindem , Martin Vigoureux , Deborah Brungard , Alvaro Retana , Yingzhen Qu Resent-Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:17 PM Dear Mohit Thank you fo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-10

See one inline. From: Acee Lindem Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 2:39 PM To: Padma Pillay-Esnault , Mohit Sethi Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" , "l...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart la

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11

Hi Mohit, Speaking as document shepherd. See inline. On 4/24/20, 3:39 AM, "Mohit Sethi via Datatracker" wrote: Reviewer: Mohit Sethi Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF docum

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11

Hi Mohit, From: Mohit Sethi M Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 2:29 AM To: Acee Lindem , "gen-art@ietf.org" Cc: "l...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" , "last-c...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-m

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi Elwyn, On 5/11/20, 2:10 PM, "Elwyn Davies" wrote: Hi, Peter. In the light of some of your responses here, I would just like to clarify that one of the reasons for gen-art reviews is to try and make extremely complicated technical documents more accessible for those who

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi Alvaro, Elwyn, From: Alvaro Retana Date: Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM To: Acee Lindem , "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" , Elwyn Davies , "gen-art@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org" , "l...@ietf.org&qu

Re: [Gen-art] [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi Les, Good point – I don’t believe any modifications are necessary. Thanks, Acee From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 5:46 PM To: Alvaro Retana , Acee Lindem , "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" , Elwyn Davies , "gen-art@ietf.org" Cc: "l

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12

Hi Linda, One more point... On 6/9/20, 4:52 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote: Linda, On 09/06/2020 02:37, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Peter, > > Thank you very much for adding the extra text to explain. > > But SR is supposed to be transparent to all intermediate nodes. Does y

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06

Hi Paul, On 9/20/22, 1:42 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" wrote: Ketan, On 9/20/22 10:30 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > 1) NIT: 1 Introduction > > IDNITS reports: > > -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. > 'IEEE802.1AX'