Given that this document, once published as an RFC, places normative
restrictions on IETF work, it seems odd to list it as "Informational"?
Wouldn't BCP be a better status for it?
During the long bleak winter where this review sat answered :), we did change
it to STD.
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready
This a request gen-art early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nd-gaao.
As it is an early review, these comments are intended to help the working group
as it proceeds with the document.
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Ovarall status: Mostly, this is in quite g
