[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03

2025-02-25 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
I think Paul's looking in the wrong place for the normative requirement (that is, I like the style that Structured Fields uses to define headers, and the use of "X header is a List ..."), but I'm also having trouble finding the actual requirements on the sender and receiver in https://www.ietf.org/

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03

2025-02-25 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Mark, We seem to be talking past on another. I get it that you have deferred the syntax to [STRUCTURED-FIELDS], and I am not reviewing that. My point is that the directive in your document to follow the specification in [STRUCTURED-FIELDS] is not itself clearly normative. The statement: