[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-17

2024-12-09 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Robert, thank you for your review. Please, see inline. > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Pleas

[Gen-art] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-17

2024-12-09 Thread Robert Sparks
also inline. On 12/9/24 7:34 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote: Hi Robert, thank you for your review. Please, see inline. Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being p

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-13

2024-12-09 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Dan, Version -14 incorporates the two changes below, updates Albert's email address, and adds instructions to IANA as flagged during their review. -- Jeff On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 01:08:39AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Your proposals are acceptable for me. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Sat,

[Gen-art] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-17

2024-12-09 Thread Valery Smyslov
Please, see inline as well (and I deleted parts where we are in agreement). > Small touches like this are an improvement. Please skim through all the bare > SHOULDs (and SHOULD NOTs) to see if something similar should be said. I'll try to do my best. > >> 7th paragraph of 2.3.3 fails to parse at

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-11

2024-12-09 Thread Reese Enghardt
Hi Med, Thanks for the responses and changes, these are helpful and address my review comments. Best, Reese On 12/6/24 23:43, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Hi Reese, Thank you for the review. All good points. A diff can be seen at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=http