Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mo
This is fine with me, maybe this is worth explaining in text.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:31 PM Reshad Rahman wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the review. One response inline.
>
> On Friday, December 6, 2024 at 04:21:35 AM EST, Dan Romascanu via
> Datatracker wrote:
>
>
> Reviewer:
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response.
Please see in-line.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 01:21:33AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
> wrote:
> > This is a clear, well-written document. It is almost Ready with one
> minor
Your proposals are acceptable for me.
Regards,
Dan
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 1:00 AM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 12:23:02AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > > In other words, the implementations know the use cases
Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
Dan,
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 12:23:02AM +0200, Dan Romascanu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > In other words, the implementations know the use cases best for their
> > deployments..
>
> Maybe a short text would clarify. It was not obvious for me, but it may be
> my
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the review. One response inline.
On Friday, December 6, 2024 at 04:21:35 AM EST, Dan Romascanu via
Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) re
Dan,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 01:21:33AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker wrote:
> This is a clear, well-written document. It is almost Ready with one minor
> issue
> (which may be just a clarification issue) and a couple of editorial nits.
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> 1. Section
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more informa
Hi Reese,
Thank you for the review.
All good points. A diff can be seen at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://boucadair.github.io/attachment-circuit-model/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue.txt&url_2=https://boucadair.github.io/attachment-circuit-model/reese-review/draft-i
Hi Behcet,
Thank you for the review. Appreciated.
This will be ACKed in the next iteration.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker
> Envoyé : vendredi 6 décembre 2024 18:21
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac@ietf.org; l
11 matches
Mail list logo
