> On Feb 7, 2024, at 06:46, Rick Taylor wrote:
>
> The main point of discussion here is about IETF process: obsoleting IRTF
> documents by the IETF is considered unusual. Finding a simple way around
> this, such as not obsoleting 7116 is an approach we could consider, it's
> just a matter of
Hi,
On 9 Feb 2024, at 19:51, Ran Atkinson wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2024, at 06:46, Rick Taylor wrote:
>>
>> The main point of discussion here is about IETF process: obsoleting IRTF
>> documents by the IETF is considered unusual. Finding a simple way around
>> this, such as not obsoleting 7116 is an a
