Hi Dale, all,
Please see one comment inline.
Cheers,
Med
>
> > On Jan 22, 2024, at 17:46, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Dale Worley
> > Review result: Ready with Nits
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART
Hi Russ,
Thank you for the prompt review, comments inline...
On 01/02/2024 22:18, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proces
Rick,
A similar concern came up during review of the TCPCLv4 and the settled solution
there was to create parallel sub-registries so that the IRTF-defined ones were
left as-is and became effectively ‘historical’ though the official status did
not change.
It seems like a larger overall conce
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last-call comments.
For more i
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more i
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more i
