Russ, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion.
I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review.
Lars
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 23:17, Russ Housley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am
Christer, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 12:28, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. T
Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On Dec 18, 2023, at 20:51, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Rev
> On Jan 4, 2024, at 07:00, Lars Eggert wrote:
>
> Vijay, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
> this document.
Yes - it was good to get rid of the line numbers in the normative pseudocode as
they served no purpose.
Thanks,
Acee
>
> Lars
>
>
>> On Dec 18
Linda:
Thanks for your review.
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
