Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08

2023-10-13 Thread Lars Eggert
Robert, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review (which I think will be straightforward to address). Lars > On Jun 14, 2023, at 00:59, Robert Sparks via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewe

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis-09

2023-10-13 Thread Lars Eggert
Dale, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On Oct 6, 2023, at 23:05, Dale Worley via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

Re: [Gen-art] [Sedate] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-08

2023-10-13 Thread Edward Welbourne
On Jun 14, 2023, at 00:59, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: > And to make sure - you want to allow more than one / in the time-zone-name > production, such as America/Chicago/Canaryville? Yes. Specifically: America/North_Dakota/Center America/North_Dakota/Beulah America/North_Dakota/New_Sa

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-17

2023-10-13 Thread Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
Reviewer: Thomas Fossati Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For m

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06

2023-10-13 Thread peter
Greg, Thanks for considering my review comments. My responses to specific points are found below. Kind regards, -Peter From: Greg Mirsky Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 1:54 AM To: Peter Yee Cc: gen-art ; draft-ietf-