[Gen-art] Golden Gate Tap Room (was: Re: Extended GEN area volunteers' get-together at IETF 117)

2023-07-23 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, Peter booked us into Golden Gate Tap Room (https://www.ggtaproom.com/) from 7PM-9PM tonight. It's a few minutes walk from the Hilton: https://goo.gl/maps/V3NqLSQam9AvsNKS9 See you there! Lars signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP _

Re: [Gen-art] Golden Gate Tap Room (was: Re: Extended GEN area volunteers' get-together at IETF 117)

2023-07-23 Thread Lars Eggert
Could someone ACK the receipt of this email? Did it not make it? -- Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos. > On Jul 23, 2023, at 13:23, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Hi, > > Peter booked us into Golden Gate Tap Room (https://www.ggtaproom.com/) from > 7PM-9PM tonight. It's a few minutes w

Re: [Gen-art] Golden Gate Tap Room (was: Re: Extended GEN area volunteers' get-together at IETF 117)

2023-07-23 Thread Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
Got it (before and again now). See you there soon! Cheers, Charles > On Jul 23, 2023, at 6:11 PM, Lars Eggert wrote: > > Could someone ACK the receipt of this email? Did it not make it? > > -- > Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos. > >> On Jul 23, 2023, at 13:23, Lars Eggert wrot

Re: [Gen-art] Golden Gate Tap Room (was: Re: Extended GEN area volunteers' get-together at IETF 117)

2023-07-23 Thread Greg Wood
Got it and I’ve arrived early. Be prepared to show ID and come up the stairs or elevator to the reserved section. — Greg Wood +1-703-625-3917 > On Jul 23, 2023, at 6:13 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) > wrote: > > Got it (before and again now). See you there soon! > > Cheers, > Charles > >

Re: [Gen-art] Golden Gate Tap Room (was: Re: Extended GEN area volunteers' get-together at IETF 117)

2023-07-23 Thread Martin Thomson
I just got bounced. Novice move, I know, but in case anyone else is late… On Sun, Jul 23, 2023, at 18:13, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote: > Got it (before and again now). See you there soon! > > Cheers, > Charles > >> On Jul 23, 2023, at 6:11 PM, Lars Eggert wrote: >> >> Could someone ACK the rec