FWIW, this is in line with what I understood the previous sentences to mean as
well — so I’m happy for this being a simpler and more precise language.
What we were really trying to avoid is things like, for example, someone
putting a URI in as their “type” value and doing URI-level equivalence b
Thanks for confirming Justin.
A draft -17 has been published with the changes discussed in this thread.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 7:32 AM Justin Richer wrote:
> FWIW, this is in line with what I understood the previous sentences to
> mean as well — so I’m happy for this being a simpler and more
