Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a DISCUSS ballot for this
document (as a placeholder for IANA).
Lars
> On 2022-4-5, at 21:18, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft
Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On 2022-4-28, at 20:20, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The Gener
David, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2022-5-24, at 16:59, David Schinazi via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: David Schinazi
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Christer, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On 2022-5-28, at 20:53, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The Gene
Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
Lars
> On 2022-6-8, at 23:40, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Te
Gyan, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2022-6-13, at 17:13, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (G
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2022-06-16
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Vijay Gurbani Last Call 2022-05-19 draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-16
For telechat 2022-06-30
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Suhas Nandakumar
>> Nits fulls up three errors:
>>
>> ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2385 (Obsoleted by RFC 5925)
>> ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5246 (Obsoleted by RFC 8446)
>> ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 8208 (Obsoleted by RFC 8608)
the first remains, with explanation
the last two wer