Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-13

2022-02-02 Thread Carsten Rossenhoevel
Hi Matt, Toerless, Thank you both for your guidance.  We will proceed as suggested. Best regards, Carsten Am 02.02.2022 um 08:32 schrieb Matt Joras: Hi Carsten, I don't have a good answer unfortunately. In my opinion the mentions of QUIC and HTTP/3 don't add a lot, and feel a bit bolted on

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance-13

2022-02-02 Thread Toerless Eckert
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:32:29PM -0800, Matt Joras wrote: > If it were me I would perhaps instead make a note of QUIC as a potential > transport protocol for HTTP, and acknowledge that the document will not > attempt to enumerate specific testing procedures for it. The current text > probably wou

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10

2022-02-02 Thread Dale Worley via Datatracker
Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more i