Hi Gyan,
Thank you. Please see the responses inline.
Gyan> Agreed that is acceptable. In the description as well maybe listing a
pecking order similar to what is described in Gao-Rexford model style
route preference in the import and export policy verbiage for each role.
[KS/AA]: That is intere
Top-reply (sorry) and first-of-thread reply (also sorry):
The diagram question/issue might be addressed by referencing the
better-than-Gao-Rexford model published in RFC7908 (included in the
References).
It has actual diagrams, including the initial role labeling on peering
sessions (excluding RS a
Colleagues,
I would like to unveil what took us so long to reply.
We have an ongoing discussion about adding a formal description of
Complex/Sibling relations.
With the import and export policy definitions, it can be done rather easy,
it follows the Peer definition that Sriram has already shown:
On January 5, 2022 at 12:12:14 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote:
Sriram:
Hi!
> [KS/AA]: That is interesting. We did already enhance the Role descriptions
> [KS/AA]: as follows to add the import policy verbiage (to the already
> [KS/AA]: existing export policy) in Sec. 2 of v-19 to be uploaded:
Hi Brian
I agree that RFC 7908 reference would help.
Thank you
Gyan
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:09 PM Brian Dickson
wrote:
> Top-reply (sorry) and first-of-thread reply (also sorry):
> The diagram question/issue might be addressed by referencing the
> better-than-Gao-Rexford model published in R
Hi Alvaro
Responses In-line
I think the document needs to clearly state that the role priority by
itself does not have an import policy that is automatically configured.
The import policy is based on OTC Attribute. The document should also
clearly state that Role priority must be used in conjunc
Alvaro,
Since I was pushing adding the ingress rules into the peering relation
definition I will try to answer your comments.
чт, 6 янв. 2022 г. в 00:33, Alvaro Retana :
> On January 5, 2022 at 12:12:14 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote:
>
>
> Sriram:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> > [KS/AA]: That is interesting. W
On January 5, 2022 at 5:35:31 PM, Alexander Azimov wrote:
Alexander:
...
> > > [KS/AA]: That is interesting. We did already enhance the Role descriptions
> > > [KS/AA]: as follows to add the import policy verbiage (to the already
> > > [KS/AA]: existing export policy) in Sec. 2 of v-19 to be up
