[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-04

2021-12-06 Thread Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
Reviewer: Thomas Fossati Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

2021-12-06 Thread t petch
On 05/12/2021 22:49, Dale R. Worley wrote: t petch writes: I think that your comments are excellent as comments on a isolated I-D but might not be such an improvement for the set of six (or seven or eight) that I reference. When these I-D first appeared, there was a debate on the WG list.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-04

2021-12-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Thomas, Thanks for the careful reading and review. I think we can deal with all your comments without difficulty. Just two possible discussion points in line below. Regards Brian On 07-Dec-21 03:58, Thomas Fossati via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Thomas Fossati Review result: Ready with

Re: [Gen-art] [I2nsf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-12

2021-12-06 Thread Dale R. Worley
t petch writes: > My > concern is that a change that improves one I-D in isolation may not be > an improvement in the context of the cluster. Last Call, and > Directorate reviews, as currently structured, may not be well suited to > this but it is the process that we have. My assumption is t