[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07

2021-09-07 Thread Peter Yee via Datatracker
Reviewer: Peter Yee Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more i

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07

2021-09-07 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021, at 17:00, Peter Yee via Datatracker wrote: > Summary: This document provides a JMAP extension that allows the JMAP server > to > provide its thoughts on the verification of a messages S/MIME signature. > While > the details of the extension seem fine, I'm not convinced that

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-12

2021-09-07 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Hi Matt, Thanks for comment. Most of comments I have taken care. Please find inline questions. From: Matt Joras via Datatracker Date: Friday, August 27, 2021 at 8:39 AM To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: b...@ietf.org , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy@ietf.org , last-c...@ietf.org Subject: G

Re: [Gen-art] [alto] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-16

2021-09-07 Thread Russ Housley
Hi. The vast bulk of the changes resolve my comments. I'm dropping the resolved comments from my reply. > > Section 5.6, 3rd paragraph after bullets: I do not understand the > second MUST statement in this paragraph. The sentence seems to contain > a mix of defining the superset and a MUST

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-12

2021-09-07 Thread Wessels, Duane
Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline. > On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker > wrote: > > > Minor issues: > > 1. In Section 4.1: > >> DNS clients MAY also enable TFO when possible. > > Maybe I do not fully understand the intent here, but 'MAY ... when pos

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-danyliw-replace-ftp-pointers-03

2021-09-07 Thread Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more informati

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-12

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Romascanu
Hi Duane, Thank you for your answer and for addressing my concerns. I am fine with the proposed resolutions. Regards, Dan On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:46 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > Dan, thanks for the review. Responses are inline. > > > > > On Sep 1, 2021, at 3:12 AM, Dan Romascanu via Datatrac

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-smime-07

2021-09-07 Thread Peter Yee
Thanks for that Bron. I suspected there was a discussion about this topic in the WG, but that it simply wasn't reflected in the I-D. For those of us who haven't kept up, adding a little bit of that discussion into the introductory material would help a lot. Kind