[Gen-art] Review Assignments

2021-08-12 Thread Jean Mahoney via Datatracker
Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2021-08-12 Reviewer Type LC end Draft Stewart Bryant Telechat 2021-06-15 draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08 (-06 lc reviewed) Last calls: Reviewer Type LC end Draft Elwyn Davies

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08

2021-08-12 Thread Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Not Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new ve

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08

2021-08-12 Thread Giuseppe Fioccola
Hi Stewart, I plan to revise the draft in the coming weeks to address the comments from the ADs. I will double check your concerns as well. Thanks, Giuseppe -Original Message- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 4:56 PM To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-i

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13

2021-08-12 Thread David Schinazi via Datatracker
Reviewer: David Schinazi Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13

2021-08-12 Thread Mark Nottingham
Hi David, Thanks for the feedback. Responses below. > On 13 Aug 2021, at 4:36 am, David Schinazi via Datatracker > wrote: > > Minor issues: > * s4.5 seems to prohibit defining new non-generic HTTP methods. How do we > reconcile that with the work happening in MASQUE? I know that CONNECT is its