[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04

Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mor

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16

Dale, thank you for your review, which I hope will see a response soon. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-6-10, at 3:51, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer f

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16

Am 11.06.2021 um 13:44 schrieb Lars Eggert: Dale, thank you for your review, which I hope will see a response soon. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars ... We're currently collecting the feedback in Github (here: ) and ar

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16

Mohit, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-5-30, at 17:14, Mohit Sethi via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Mohit Sethi > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Rev

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12

Russ, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-5-6, at 20:49, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

Dear Russ, Thanks, your proposed changes looks good to me. Best, Theresa ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

Dear Pierce, Once published, this I-D will result in a new numbered RFC, which updates 8226. Note that this is exactly the procedure to issue an RFC 8226bis (i.e., a -bis document is always a new numbered RFC, and the published RFC 8226 does not change). Apologies if I misunderstood your que

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

I think Pierce's question was whether _this_ document, once published as an RFC, obsoletes (and replaces) 8226. It does not. It only updates 8226, as noted on the first page, and in the metadata captured in the datatracker. There is not an 8226bis effort underway at this time. I've set the Re

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02

Thank you Theresa. Russ also said a new numbered RFC updating 8226, but I appreciate the additional procedural detail you provide. You've both answered my question. Thank you. Best regards, Pierce -Original Message- From: Theresa Enghardt Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 12:39 PM To: