Matt, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2021-3-13, at 4:14, Matt Joras via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Matt Joras
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> 1. Introduction
>
> As Segment Routing with IPv6 data plane (SRv6) [RFC84
Hi Elwyn,
have you had a chance to check whether the -03 version of the I-D addresses
your review?
Thanks,
Lars
On 2021-5-9, at 22:51, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
> Hi Elwyn,
>
> I finally got around to process your review.
>
> I have submitted a new version -03 based on this review.
> I coul
Elwyn, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following
discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Based on my
checks, the latest version addresses your review issues; please let me know if
you disagree.
Lars
> On 2021-5-3, at 21:56, Elwyn Davies via Data
Joel, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion.
I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.
Lars
> On 2021-5-14, at 23:34, Joel Halpern via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-A
Meral, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2021-2-26, at 4:44, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area R
Hi Carsten,
Small nit. I had a quick read of the diff and although section 2 looks good
with the new HTML and CSS, the formula looks mangled in the data tracker format
("present(fc) ⋅ 2").
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-03.txt
Ciao!
--
Jaime Jiménez
On Sun,
Hi Jaime,
Beautiful.
This problem is not in the XML generated by kramdown-rfc or in the TXT or HTML
generated from that by xml2rfc, it occurs from scratch only in xml2rfc’s (v
3.7.0) v2v3 conversion output generated from that. This appears to be new, I
haven’t seen it before.
Tracking down t
Hi Dale,
A bit thanks for your careful (as always) review.
Med, thanks for responding and updating the document.
I think there's just one point left that I want to comment on:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:38:20PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Thank you for the careful
