Gyan, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion.
I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document based on the current
status of the discussion.
Lars
> On 2021-4-29, at 8:46, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
> Review result: No
Reviewer: Matt Joras
Review result: Ready
I reviewed this document but foolishly forgot to post it. Luckily I found no
issues.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Hi Lars’s & DC Gateway authors
I will be responding back today to the Gen-Art original email I sent with
final comments and hope the final comments will help improve the document.
I will also address the comments from John Scudder related to GW
failover as well as Alvaro’s comments related t
Excellent, thanks so much for your help on this.
Yours Irrespectively,
John
Juniper Business Use Only
> -Original Message-
> From: Gyan Mishra
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 4:28 PM
> To: Lars Eggert
> Cc: General Area Review Team ; b...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
> bess-datacenter-gateway
Dear Authors,
Attached is a txt version -gsm update of version 10 that contains a first
cut at what I think would be appropriate RFC 2119 SHOULD / MUST
language for a specification. I also made some editorial updates to make
the specification clear to the reader. In this thread and on the call
