Hello Elwyn,
Thank you for you review. I have fixed the nit you pointed out in the new
version of the draft (-14).
/Ludwig
> -Original Message-
> From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
> Sent: den 23 mars 2021 23:53
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: a...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params...
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more i
Thanks Pete for the review i have addressed the nits, including the abundance
of MUSTs :) and will release in a next version 08 include other review comments.
-Chris
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 4:06 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Nit
Ines Robles:
Thank you for the careful review and comments.
> Nits/Comments:
>
> 1- Introduction: "however, these algorithms are no longer
> considered the best choices. " => It would be nice to add 1 or more
> sentences explaining why they are no longer the best choices
I suggest:
This
Hi Russ,
Thank you very much for addressing my comments promptly. I am ok with your
proposals.
BR,
Ines
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:27 PM Russ Housley wrote:
> Ines Robles:
>
> Thank you for the careful review and comments.
>
> > Nits/Comments:
> >
> > 1- Introduction: "however, these algorithm
