> On Aug 30, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mo
> On 3 Sep 2020, at 11:03, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> A network which does not support SLAAC will likely not have PIOs in its RAs.
> If a PIO is present, its sole purpose is to provide information about a
> prefix which may be considered by SLAAC (though the PIO may indicate that the
> prefix in q
> > Naively, it seems like the new prefix will almost always have longer
> > lifetime values than the old prefix, and given that this seems to be
> > how orderly renumbering causes hosts to transition from using the old
> > prefix to the new prefix, it's not clear how hosts "will normally
> > ... a
Hello, Dale,
Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my responses in-line
On 30/8/20 22:14, Dale Worley via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IE
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
Last calls:
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Elwyn Davies Last Call 2020-09-14 draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09
Francis Dupont Last Call 2020-08-26 draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology-03
Roni Even La
Fernando Gont writes:
> Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my responses in-line
You're welcome!
To be clear, I'm not disagreeing with you about any of this as questions
of *fact*, but rather saying that these points are obscure to people who
aren't familiar with the practicalities
Owen DeLong writes:
> This depends. Certainly a host which still has active flows using the
> old address will not automatically terminate those flows. Further,
> longest lifetime is not even listed as a source address selection
> criteria in RFC6724. Even if it were added, it would likely be
> su
