> >> * Also in section 3.3.1:
> >>
> >> ... This
> >> specification assumes that the access token is a PoP token as
> >> described in [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] unless specifically stated
> >> otherwise.
> >>
> >> I think "assumes ... unless" should be "MUST ... unless".
> >
>
Hi all,
On 08/03/2020 08:21 AM, Seitz Ludwig wrote:
* Also in section 3.3.1:
... This
specification assumes that the access token is a PoP token as
described in [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] unless specifically stated
otherwise.
Since no alternativ
I support Steffi's suggestion (i.e. make it pop-only here and allow non-pop
profiles in the framework).
/Ludwig
-Original Message-
From: Stefanie Gerdes
Sent: den 3 augusti 2020 16:18
To: Seitz Ludwig ; Benjamin Kaduk ;
Paul Kyzivat
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize@ietf.org; Gen
That seems reasonable to me.
Ludwig, are you able to raise the topic on the ACE list?
Thanks,
Ben
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:21:12PM +, Seitz Ludwig wrote:
> I support Steffi's suggestion (i.e. make it pop-only here and allow non-pop
> profiles in the framework).
>
> /Ludwig
>
> -Ori
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
-Original Message-
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:38 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review re
