Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18

2020-05-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <78c9039f-f687-41a1-a85d-cc8b3b822...@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham writes: >On 6 May 2020, at 6:29 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>=20 >> In class B people deal with huge numbers by downscaling: Millions, >> Trillions, GigaBytes and PetaBytes. Nobody really cares if the >> stim

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13

2020-05-06 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:51 PM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > I have not received the pull request yet, so I will comment only based on > your e-mail reply :) > Apologies for the delay. PR is now up at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1171

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13

2020-05-06 Thread Christer Holmberg
Hi Yoav, >> I have not received the pull request yet, so I will comment only based on >> your e-mail reply :) > > Apologies for the delay. PR is now up at  > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0a42e34e-54e25920-0a42a3d5- > 869a14f4b08c-11c3f32cbd74f2f2&q=1&e=978d85da-fab3-4523-a8d9-447aa6bdf05

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13

2020-05-06 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:43 PM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > >> I have not received the pull request yet, so I will comment only based > on your e-mail reply :) > > > > Apologies for the delay. PR is now up at > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0a42

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-16

2020-05-06 Thread Alissa Cooper
Jouni, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Apr 16, 2020, at 5:37 PM, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) re

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

2020-05-06 Thread Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07

2020-05-06 Thread Alissa Cooper
Theresa, thanks for your review. John, thanks for making the changes. I entered a No Objection ballot. I understand why you removed the draft references, but it would be good to explain a little bit in the text about the code point values, even without references. Alissa > On Apr 30, 2020, at

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01

2020-05-06 Thread Alissa Cooper
Ines, thanks for your review. Barry, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Apr 30, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Ines Robles > wrote: > > Hi Barry, > > Thank you for the fast response and addressing the comments. > > Have a nice day, > > Ines. > > On Thu, Apr 30, 20

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18

2020-05-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
> On 6 May 2020, at 5:00 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Example-ScaledInt: 4503;suffix=M > > Would that work without an explanation ? Perhaps in full context: ~~~ For example: Example-ScaledInt: 4503; suffix=M Could be used to indicate a scaled value; in this case, 4,503,000,000, if t

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18

2020-05-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <977f061c-a4bb-413b-b26c-51c7a694f...@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham writes: >Perhaps in full context: > >~~~ >For example: > > Example-ScaledInt: 4503; suffix=3DM > >Could be used to indicate a scaled value; in this case, 4,503,000,000, = >if the `M` suffix parameter is specifie