Dear Linda,
Thanks for your review!
Please find my answers inline tagged as [GF].
Let me know if you agree with my proposed small changes to the draft.
Regards,
Giuseppe
-Original Message-
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 11:20
Giuseppe,
Thank you very much for the response. Agree with your proposed changes.
Just one more question, I remember that the P2P Alternative Marking is achieved
by sequence of 1 and sequence of 0. So the receiver can detect the change when
the Marking changes between 1 and 0. But with multi-
Wow, apologies, I had completely missed this email -- I have a complex
set of filtering rules to allow me to focus on drafts on the upcoming
telechats, and this fell into the cracks.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:57 AM Francis Dupont
wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The
Whoops, apologies, I just realized that I forgot to mention that I've
posted a new version (-05) addressing these / hit send too soon.
Thank you again, Francis.
W
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:09 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> Wow, apologies, I had completely missed this email -- I have a complex
> se
Hi Linda,
Thanks for the feedback!
I will submit the new version by Monday.
Regarding your question, with multipoint path the egress nodes receive
alternative marked packets in random order from different ingress nodes, but
the reordering does not affect the measurement if it is satisfied the con
Giuseppe,
Thank you very much for the explanation. It is good.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Giuseppe Fioccola
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Linda Dunbar ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
last-c...@ietf.org
Subject: R
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review result: Ready
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-05
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction f