Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07

Theresa, thanks for your review. Tarek, thanks for addressing Theresa’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 11, 2020, at 2:57 PM, Tarek Saad wrote: > > Hi Theresa, > > Thanks again for your feedback and confirmation. > The document has been scheduled for a telechat. I

Re: [Gen-art] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-02

Linda, thanks for your review. Carsten, thanks for your response. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to ask some questions about interoperability. Best, Alissa > On Oct 31, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > > Hi Linda, > > thank you for this review. > >> On Oct 31, 2019, at 17:41, Linda Du

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-backbone-router-14

Elwyn, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 7, 2020, at 2:54 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > wrote: > > Hello Elwyn > > I implemented it on Cisco IOS years ago. What really hurts is the delay > between that and the spec

Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08

Francesca, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Best, Alissa > On Feb 3, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Francesca Palombini > wrote: > > Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update! > > Francesca > > On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthub

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12

Peter, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Best, Alissa > On Feb 18, 2020, at 10:21 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > wrote: > > Many thanks for your review Peter! > > I applied all your typo fix suggestions that are not discussed below.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-06

Suhas, thanks for your review. Chuck, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot. Best, Alissa > On Jan 29, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > OK. The next submitted revision will include changes resulting from > the Gen-ART review. I'm waiting for resolution of SecDir

Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-06

Tim, thanks for your review. Michael, thanks for your response. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to check on the address generation mechanism for use with SLAAC. Best, Alissa > On Jan 16, 2020, at 8:21 PM, Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > > Excellent, thanks! > > On 1/16/20, 5:03 PM, "Michael Richar

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04

Brian, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jan 24, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-04 > > I am the assigned

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13

Paul, thanks for your review. I have cc’ed you on my DISCUSS ballot. Best, Alissa > On Feb 18, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03

Joel, thanks for your review. Yann, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. One comment below. > On Dec 30, 2019, at 2:19 PM, Yann Collet wrote: > >> I assume that the "last block" flag is the least significant bit of the >> first byte of the block header? > > Yes, this i