Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-12

2020-02-18 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Many thanks for your review Peter! I applied all your typo fix suggestions that are not discussed below. > Page 14, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: change “a same” to one of “any”, “any > single”, or something similar. These suggestions are based on the assumption > that fragments from disparate da

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

2020-02-18 Thread Francis Dupont
tps://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20200212 IETF LC End Date: 20200218 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: crypto use details are missing. IMHO it is a problem of presen

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sdi-02.txt

2020-02-18 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
iewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20200212 > IETF LC End Date: 20200218 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Almost Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: crypto use details are missing. IMHO it is a problem of > presentation, I propose: > -

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: CALL to revoke last call: Re: [tsvwg] Request for working group feedback on draft-kuehlewind-system-ports (6th March, 2020)

2020-02-18 Thread Robert Sparks
Hi Joe - Thanks for the heads up. I haven't been following this and am just starting to read the threads on tsvwg, so apologies if my question below has already been addressed. On 2/17/20 5:09 PM, Joe Touch wrote: FYI to the ARTs involved. Discussion appears to at least be started in TSVW

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13

2020-02-18 Thread Paul Kyzivat
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, pleas

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15

2020-02-18 Thread David Schinazi
Hi Erik, Thank you for your review. Responses inline. Thanks, David On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:38 PM Erik Kline via Datatracker wrote: [snip] > Are any of the recommendations for client resolvers in this document > covered the IPR (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3077/) claimed for: > > h

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15

2020-02-18 Thread Erik Kline
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 12:43, David Schinazi wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > Thank you for your review. Responses inline. > > Thanks, > David > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:38 PM Erik Kline via Datatracker > wrote: > [snip] >> >> Are any of the recommendations for client resolvers in this document >> c

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00

2020-02-18 Thread Dale Worley via Datatracker
Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mor