On 2019-12-19 21:23, elwynd wrote:
Hi, Ludwig.
Thanks for the prompt response.
Regarding he major issue, I understand what the intention of the split
was, but as far as early implementations are concerned, there is no such
thing as a 'minimal breakage'; unless there is some cunning mechanism in
Hi, Ludwig.Yes, -08 addresses the two points noted below... unfortunately you
didn't fix the various nits and the other minor issues as you indicated you
were intending to in your initial response (EC => EC2, etc).Enjoy the
holidays!Cheers,ElwynSent from Samsung tablet.
Original message
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like
any other last call comments.
For more
