On 7/2/19 4:24 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
On Jun 28, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker
wrote:
Issue:
The discussion of recursive resolvers in section 6.1 may need additional
consideration. In particular, the recommendation to pass a received error code
along to a client has, I t
On Jul 3, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> And I think that's a problem.
>
> What does a NOTIMP mean to the client? Most of the draft says "The server
> doesn't implement DSO". It doesn't say "doesn't implement DSO for this
> particular set of bits in this query". Section 6.2.2 says th
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2019-07-11
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Jari Arkko Last Call 2019-06-04
draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22 *
Roni Even Telechat 2019-06-26
draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-
Hi Pete,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:47 AM Pete Resnick wrote:
> It's not just that the address selection is for new connections, though
> that is certainly true. It's also the question of who is doing what:
> Hosts figure out the address for default address selection, and
> applications are the one
Hi Jen,
Thanks for the additional updates. A few comments inline.
On 3 Jul 2019, at 20:07, Jen Linkova wrote:
Again, hosts pick default addresses for applications to use, and
applications pick the addresses that packets will use.
OK, I guess we are just using different terminology here...
Fo
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
